MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007312244

LA INVESTIGACIÓN; UNA NECESIDAD DE APRENDIZAJE EN EL BACHILLERATO

2019· article· es· W3007312244 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEducational Research and Science Teaching
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)HumanitiesCommissionBlueprintSociologyPolitical scienceGeographyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this research was to describe the theoretical foundations towards an approach to the application of research in learning in the Baccalaureate area. The theoretical bases studied were the exposure and contrast of the different criteria of several authors. The initial methodology was documentaryresearch and then applied as an approach to action research in the school context. The result was the exposition of the problem of scientific research in Ecuador, starting from the problem of teacher training and the lack of interest by students to carry out research and projects aimed at society, as a conclusion, problems in cognitive development are obtained of critical thinking and the inability to analyze information. Keywords: Teacher training, Documentary research, high school study. References [1]E. Ayala, «La investigacion cientifica en las universidades ecuatorianas,» Anales, vol. 3, no 57, pp. 61-72, 2015. [2]A. y. B. A. Martinez, «Aprendizaje basado en la investigacion,» de Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico, 2013. [3]O. Hurtado, «Sistema de educacion superior del Ecuador,» Quito, 2015. [4]M. B. P. y. D. J. Roach, «Developing Research Capabilities through Technology Enhanced Learning,» Interactions, vol. 4, no 1, pp. 15-25, 2010. [5]A. Torres, «Aprendizaje Basado en la Investigacion. Tecnicas Didacticas,» de Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico, 2012. [6]Boyer Commission Report, «The Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University, Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America’s Research Universities.,» Canada, 2013. [7]A. B. L. S. L. y. S. E. Hunter, «Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development.,» Science Education, vol. 97, no 71, pp. 36-74, 2007. [8]F. Bijarro, «Desarrollo estrategico para la investigacion cientifica,» 08 15 2016. [Online]. Available: www.eumed.net/libros-gratis/2007c/306/306.zip. [Last access: sep 2019] [9]J. and. B. P. Dempster, «Developing Research-Based Learning Using ICT in Higher Education Curricula: The Role of Research and Evaluation,» Academic andEducational Development: Research, Evaluation and Changing Practice in Higher Education., vol. 11, no 1, pp. 129-139, 2002. [10]M. B. P. and. D. J. Roach, «Supporting high level learning through research-based methods: A framework for course development.,» Innovations in Education and Training International, vol. 38, no 4, pp. 369-382, 2013.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it