MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007336029 · doi:10.1142/s0129183120500734

Numerical simulation of blood flow in intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular Woven EndoBridge technique

2020· article· en· W3007336029 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics C · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAneurysmBlood flowHemodynamicsComputational fluid dynamicsFluid–structure interactionAnterior communicating arteryComputer scienceMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineRadiologyMechanicsStructural engineeringPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past few decades, different therapeutic methods for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms have been developed. During recent years, novel standalone intrasaccular Woven EndoBridge (WEB) technique has paved the way for efficient therapy and reduced some deficiencies in prior procedures. Blood hemodynamics plays a crucial role in occurrence and perpetuating of aneurysm; therefore, understanding of relevant parameters can lead to a better treatment and evolution of design. Objectively, this paper has established the first mathematical framework to explore hemodynamic parameters for WEB-treated saccular aneurysms by employing Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). Two ideal models of artery — one is suffered by a bifurcation aneurysm at Basilar Artery (BA) and another Posterior Cerebral Artery (PCA) aneurysm — are selected. Simulations are performed for an untreated and three WEB-treated aneurysms by Dual Layer (DL), Single Layer (SL) and Single Layer Sphere (SLS) WEBs. Results demonstrate that, generally, the WEB reduces flow intrusion and circulation inside the aneurysm sac, which leads to lowering WSS; however, the infiltrated flow to the WEB causes slight increase in intrasaccular pressure. Moreover, the numerical results show that the WEB DL reduces velocity and WSS, and elevates pressure inside the sac more than the WEBs SL and SLS. Among the explored WEB models (DL, SL and SLS), by assuming thorough binding at the aneurysm neck, the WEB DL demonstrates much efficient performance in flow diversion from the aneurysm, while despite the different structure of WEBs SL and SLS, they perform similarly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it