Power sharing strategy for multi‐source electrical auxiliary power unit with bi‐directional interaction capability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents a hierarchical control strategy for an auxiliary power unit (APU) for aircraft to coordinate multiple power sources and control developed power electronic interfaces. The study benefits from the presence of a hybrid energy system in paralleled structure to the main generator as the complementary system. The employed structure enhances power quality and improves the voltage profile of the high‐voltage DC bus. Furthermore, the developed bi‐directional topology provides the possibility of interaction with the grid. Considering the APU features in an aircraft, a hierarchical control strategy with different levels of control, timescale, dynamic response, and significance are developed. The developed controller consists of a power management algorithm in the higher level, and local voltage and current controllers in the lower one. The algorithm aims to maximise the PV sub‐system utilisation, overcome voltage fluctuations, increase power density, reduce operation costs, and increase system availability while allowing further development to larger systems. Simulation and experimental results confirm the robustness of the algorithm. The result shows that the proposed power sharing strategy optimises the system utilisation while achieving a high‐quality voltage profile under severe fluctuations. Moreover, the stress on the battery pack is reduced to improve the life cycle and reduce operation costs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".