MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3007378450 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.052

A53 SACCHAROMYCES BOULARDII CNCM I-745 IMPROVES ANXIETY-LIKE BEHAVIOR AND RESCUES DYSMOTILITY IN A HUMANIZED MOUSE MODEL OF IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME WITH CO-MORBID ANXIETY

2020· article· en· W3007378450 on OpenAlexaff
Marco Constante, Giada De Palma, Jun Lü, Jennifer Jury, Stephen M. Collins, Přemysl Berčík, Elena F. Verdú

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGut microbiota and health
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrritable bowel syndromeSaccharomyces boulardiiProbioticMedicineAbdominal painAnxietyGastroenterologyInternal medicineGut floraImmunologyBiologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most common conditions seen by gastroenterologists for which there is no effective cure. The pathophysiology of IBS is multifactorial and poorly understood, but the condition is characterized by chronic abdominal pain accompanied by altered bowel habits in the absence of an underlying structural abnormality. IBS is frequently associated with psychiatric co-morbidities such as anxiety and depression and has been considered a disorder of gut-brain communication. We previously developed a humanized mouse model of IBS with co-morbid anxiety (IBS+A) by colonizing germ-free mice with fecal microbiota of IBS+A patients. Aims To test the therapeutic potential of the probiotic yeast Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 (S. bou) in preventing the transfer of the IBS+A phenotype and investigated underlying mechanisms. Methods Germ-free Swiss-Webster mice were colonized with fecal microbiota from an IBS+A patient or from a healthy subject (controls) and after three weeks they were gavaged daily for two weeks with 3g/kg/day of the probiotic S. bou (Biocodex–France) or water. Behavior, intestinal motility and permeability were assessed at sacrifice. Potential mechanisms were assessed by microbiota 16S rRNA gene sequencing, gene expression by Nanostring Counter Gene Expression and indole quantification by absorption using Kovak’s reagent. Results IBS+A colonized mice developed 25% faster gastrointestinal transit (P<0.05) and had a 3-fold longer latency time in the step-down test (P<0.001), indicative of anxiety-like behaviour compared with controls. S. bou normalized gastrointestinal transit (P<0.05) and shortened by 50% the step-down latency (P<0.01), compared to water-treated mice. Microbiota of IBS+A colonized mice had higher abundance of Unc. Erysipelotrichaceae and Unc. Coriobacteriaceae, and lower abundance of Oscillospira, Weissela, and Fructubacillus. S. bou treatment prevented these changes and the microbiota was similar to controls. Predicted function analysis in S. bou treated mice suggested higher number of genes implicated in indole biosynthesis (P<0.05) and S. bou increased indole levels by 20% in vitro. Finally, Trpv1, a gene implicated in visceral hypersensitivity and anxiety, was increased by 2-fold in IBS+A colonized mice compared with controls (P<0.001), and this was reverted by 20% (P<0.05) by S. bou treatment. Conclusions Our data indicate that Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 supplementation improves the intestinal and behavioral phonotype that is induced by IBS+A microbiota in mice. Putative mechanisms include regulation of indole production by bacteria and regulation of host Trpv1 gene expression. The results prompt investigation of S. bou in IBS patients with co-morbid anxiety. Funding Agencies Biocodex – Gentilly – France

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicGut microbiota and health→French-language works237,207→