MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007504020 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.277

A278 TB OR NOT TB OF THE PANCREAS

2020· article· en· W3007504020 on OpenAlexaffabout
Roxana Chis, Piero Tartaro

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMalignancyEpigastric painPancreasDuodenumAbdominal painCommon bile ductGastroenterologyPancreatitisRadiologyInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Pancreatic TB is a rare clinical presentation which has proved difficult to diagnose. Its symptomatology and imaging characteristics mimic neoplastic findings. Aims We present the case of a previously healthy 58-year-old man, from an endemic area who presented with epigastric pain caused by pancreatic TB. Methods Case report and review of literature Results A previously well 58-year-old male presented to the emergency room with severe epigastric pain, without fevers or significant weight loss. He had immigrated to Canada from the Philippines in 2001. He denied a personal history of TB, however, he did report that his father had received treatment for active TB. An abdominal CT revealed intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile tree dilation with an abrupt transition in the pancreatic head, possible stricture, as well as mucosal thickening of the duodenum at the level of the abrupt narrowing of the dilated common bile duct, concerning for malignancy. Initial laboratory investigations revealed WBC 6.1 x10E9 cells/L, amylase 114 U/L and lipase 59 U/L. Malignancy work up revealed a normal Ca 19-9 at 29.6 kU/L. HIV testing was negative. CT chest revealed bilateral apical fibrotic lesions and smaller lesions throughout the upper and mid-zones bilaterally, suggestive of progressive massive fibrosis. This was in keeping with the patient’s former occupation as a miner. There was no evidence of granulomatous disease. EUS was undertaken and this revealed a mass in the head of the pancreas measuring 29 x 29 mm. The mass was invading into the common bile duct. The pancreatic head mass appeared to be invading into the duodenum, as a necrotic ulcerating lesion was also identified in the second part of the duodenum and this was biopsied. The surgical pathology returned as necrotizing granuloma, however, the tissue could not be tested for TB. The patient underwent a repeat endoscopy which again revealed a fungating and friable mass in the second part of the duodenum with biopsies taken. Pathology revealed mild chronic inflammation. Staining for Acid Fast Bacilli was negative, however, Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Complex was isolated on tissue culture. The patient was diagnosed with pancreatic TB and initiated on pyrazinamide, ethambutol, isoniazid and rifampin. Conclusions Pancreatic involvement by TB is very rare but it has been increasingly reported in both immunocompromised and immunocompetent populations. Symptomatically, pancreatic TB can present with a multitude of non-specific symptoms, including epigastric pain, fever, anorexia, weight loss, or jaundice. In addition, imaging findings of pancreatic TB may mimic malignancy. Our patient, from an endemic area, presented with epigastric pain consistent with the existing literature on pancreatic TB. Isolated pancreatic TB is a rare clinical entity but should be in the list of differential diagnoses in a patient with pancreatic mass especially in the setting of risk factors of TB. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicDiagnosis and treatment of tuberculosisFrench-language works237,207