A124 SYNERGISTIC INTERACTION OF CANNABINOIDS AND OPIOIDS REDUCES PAIN SIGNALING IN COLONIC NOCICEPTIVE NERVES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background With the recent legalization of recreational marijuana in Canada, increasing numbers of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) disorders are using cannabis to treat their pain, either alone or together with opioids. However, little is known about potential benefits of cannabinoids for treating visceral pain originating within the GI tract and whether the combined use of cannabinoids and opioids could enable the reduction or even discontinuation of opioids. Aims To investigate the effects of cannabinoids alone or in combination with opioids on colonic nociceptive nerves. Methods Extracellular afferent nerve recordings were obtained from ex vivo flat sheet preparations of male C57BL/6 mouse distal colons. Single unit analysis discriminated individual afferent neuron responses to mechanical probing of the colon with a 1g von Frey hair before and after superfusion of HU-210, a selective CB1 receptor agonist, HU-308, a selective CB2 receptor agonist, DAMGO, a selective mu-opioid receptor (MOR) agonist, or a combination. In parallel studies, perforated patch clamp techniques were employed to assess the rheobase as a measure of neuronal excitability in acutely dissociated dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons in the presence of one or more of these agonists. Data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparisons test. Results Superfusion of HU-210 (1 μM), caused significant inhibition in afferent nerve mechanosensitivity compared to control (6.2±1.1 vs. 13.7±2.5 Hz, p=0.005, n=10); lower concentrations (10 nM and 100 nM) had no effect (p>0.99, n=11; p=0.600, n=10 respectively). Conversely, the CB2 agonist HU-308 (1 μM and 10 μM), did not alter mechanosensitivity (p>0.9, n=8 for both concentrations). Superfusion of HU-210 alone (100 nM) or DAMGO (1 nM) alone in the same recording had no effect, but when both agonists were superfused together, there was a significant reduction in mechanosensitivity (8.1±1.7 vs. 14.8±2.3 Hz, p<0.01, n=10). In patch clamp recordings of DRG neurons, HU-210 (1 μM) decreased excitability (i.e. increased rheobase, 94.4±9.4 vs. 62.7±6.4 pA; p=0.031, n=9), whereas a lower concentration (100 nM) had no effect. Similar to afferent nerve recordings, when applied alone, DAMGO (1 nM) and HU-210 (100 nM) did not affect rheobase (DAMGO: p>0.99, n=9; HU-210: p>0.99, n=10), whereas the combination of both agonists significantly decreased excitability (123.0±13.4 vs. 62.7±6.4 pA, p<0.01, n=10). Conclusions Activation of CB1 receptors inhibits mechanosensitivity of colonic afferent nerves while a CB2 agonist had no effect. Interestingly, combination of sub-threshold concentrations of CB1 and MOR agonists inhibited colonic afferent nerves and thus, may suggest that cannabinoids could enable opioid dose reduction or discontinuation. Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".