MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007551622 · doi:10.1109/tim.2020.2973850

An Adaptive Particle Filter Technique for System State Estimation and Prognosis

2020· article· en· W3007551622 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohamed Ahwiadi, Wilson Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPrognosticsParticle filterDegeneracy (biology)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceFilter (signal processing)Nonlinear systemAuxiliary particle filterEngineeringControl engineeringKalman filterArtificial intelligenceData miningExtended Kalman filterPhysicsEnsemble Kalman filter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

System state estimation and prognostics are the key issues in dynamic system monitoring and management. Although the particle filter (PF) has been applied to model the nonlinear degradation feature of the system aging mechanism in several studies, it has two potential problems: the sample degeneracy and the impoverishment. To tackle these problems, a new adaptive particle filter (APF) technique is proposed in this article to enhance the performance of PFs. In the APF, a self-evaluation method is suggested to track the posterior distribution and detect the low-weight particles (sample degeneracy). A new adaptive weight adjustment approach is proposed to adaptively explore the posterior space, process those low-weight particles, and tackle the sample degeneracy. The effectiveness of the proposed APF technique is validated by simulation tests using several model conditions. It is also implemented for battery-health monitoring and prognosis. Test results show that the proposed APF technology can effectively capture and track the system's dynamic characteristics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations85
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementSame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207