MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007585147 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.006

A7 DEVELOPING NEW TOOLS TO IDENTIFY NOVELS TARGETS TO OVERCOME TREATMENT RESISTANCE IN ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

2020· article· en· W3007585147 on OpenAlexaffabout
J Douchin, Nolwenn Lemaire, E Kérignard, Véronique Giroux

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Cells and Metastasis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancer stem cellEsophageal cancerMedicineCancerFlow cytometryRadiation therapyPopulationChemotherapyCancer researchOncologyStem cellCellCell cultureInternal medicineImmunologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background In Canada, patients with esophageal cancer have the 2nd worst 5-year survival rate (14%). Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the most common esophageal cancer type worldwide. Its high mortality rate is partly due to the treatment resistance acquired by patients, which has mostly been attributed to the presence of cancer stem cells (CSCs). Therefore, targeting CSCs is a promising strategy to improve treatment and survival of ESCC patients. CSCs are a subpopulation of tumor cells presenting high self-renewal and multipotent capacities, and therefore largely contribute to tumor heterogeneity in addition to treatment resistance. Aims In this study, we aim to establish human ESCC cell lines resistant to radiotherapy (TE15RR), chemotherapy (TE15CR) and both (TE15RCR), and study the relationship between resistance acquisition and CSC properties; Methods To do so, we exposed human ESCC cell line TE15 to chronic doses of radiotherapy (2 Gy/week for a total dose of 60 Gy) and/or increasing doses of chemotherapy (5-FU (1, 2, 5, 10 and 15mM)). We harvested samples at different time points to fully investigate resistance acquisition process. Then, we further validated resistance and properties of the resistant TE15 cell lines. Results We confirmed that TE15RR cells are less susceptible to radiation than control cells and showed that they are more proliferative at baseline using MTT assays. Moreover, we demonstrated that TE15RR cells comprise a higher proportion of CD24high/CD44high CSC population using flow cytometry. We also found that they express higher levels of ALDH1, another well-known CSC marker, by qPCR and Western Blot. Our preliminary observations also suggest a higher invasive phenotype in TE15RR cells in limited dilution spheroid assay than in control cells supporting that TE15RR cells display CSC-like properties. TE15CR and TE15RCR cell lines were validated using similar approaches. Finally, mass spectrometry was performed to compare the proteomic profile of the resistant cell lines to the control cell line in order to identify key players in treatment resistance acquisition. Conclusions Brief, we developed radioresistant, chemoresistant and radiochemoresistant human ESCC cell lines and demonstrated that resistance acquisition correlates with CSC enrichment. Mass spectrophotometry revealed significant proteomic differences between resistant and control cell lines, which should lead to the identification of novel targets to overcome resistance in ESCC patients. Funding Agencies Canada research chair TIER 2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicCancer Cells and MetastasisFrench-language works237,207