Magnetoelectric polarizability: A microscopic perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We extend a field theoretic approach for the investigation of the electronic charge-current density response of crystalline systems to arbitrary electromagnetic fields. The approach leads to the introduction of microscopic polarization and magnetization fields, as well as free charge and current densities, the dynamics of which are described by a lattice gauge theory. The spatial averages of such quantities constitute the fields of macroscopic electrodynamics. We implement this formalism to study the modifications of the orbital electronic properties of a class of insulators due to uniform dc electric and magnetic fields, at zero temperature. To first order in the electric and magnetic fields, the free charge and current densities vanish; thus the linear effect of such fields is captured by the first-order modifications of the microscopic polarization and magnetization fields. Associated with the dipole moment of the microscopic polarization (magnetization) field is a macroscopic polarization (magnetization), for which we extract various tensors relating it to the electric and magnetic fields. We focus on the orbital magnetoelectric polarizability (OMP) tensor, and find the accepted expression as derived from the "modern theory of polarization and magnetization." Since our results are based on the spatial averages of microscopic polarization and magnetization fields, we can identify the distinct contributions to the OMP tensor from the perspective of this microscopic theory, and we establish the general framework in which extensions to finite frequency can be made.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".