MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007599391 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.248

A249 FREQUENCY AND CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE IN PATIENTS WITH AUTOIMMUNE HEPATITIS

2020· article· en· W3007599391 on OpenAlexaff
Ellina Lytvyak, Levinus A. Dieleman, Aldo J. Montaño‐Loza

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Diseases and Immunity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAutoimmune hepatitisInternal medicineInflammatory bowel diseaseGastroenterologyUlcerative colitisCohortRetrospective cohort studyPrimary sclerosing cholangitisUnivariate analysisCrohn's diseaseHepatitisDiseaseMultivariate analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Previous studies suggested that patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have poorer outcomes; however, the significance of this association is limited. Aims To describe the phenotype of AIH-associated IBD and assess the impact of IBD on the response to treatment and risk of adverse liver outcomes in patients with AIH. Methods In our retrospective cohorts, we identified patients with concomitant diagnoses of IBD and a definite AIH. The comparison cohort consisted of AIH patients matched by gender, age at diagnosis, ethnicity, and time to follow-up. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests were used to assess differences. Univariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results We identified a total of 16 patients (9 males, 56.3%) with AIH-associated IBD from a cohort of 6006 IBD patients (0.27%) and 357 AIH patients (4.5%). All patients were Caucasians. Twelve patients (75.0%) had ulcerative colitis with a pancolonic extent; 4 (25.0%) – Crohn’s disease: one patient had ileitis, three – ileocolitis with one having stricturing and fistulising gastroduodenal, ileocolonic and perianal disease. The median age at IBD diagnosis was 26.5 years old and varied from 2 to 53. The age at AIH diagnosis ranged from 7 to 59 years old (median 21.1) and median follow-up time was 11.1 years ranging from 11 days to 35.2 years. The matching cohort of 113 AIH-IBD- patients was comparable to the AIH-IBD+ cohort by gender (44 males, 38.9%; p=0.188), age at diagnosis (median 28.4, IQR 32; p=0.442), ethnicity, and the follow-up time (median 8.7 years, IQR 10.2; p=0.764). There was no difference in AST, ALT and ALP at diagnosis. Complete response rates were similar in AIH-IBD+ and AIH-IBD- groups (50.0% vs. 53.1%; p=0.816). The risk of developing cirrhosis and a median time to its onset did not differ significantly: 28.6% vs. 31.0% (p=0.853) and 11.8 vs. 8.2 years (p=0.359), respectively. In univariate Cox regression, IBD was not a predictor of progression to cirrhosis (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.13–1.50; p=0.192). The risk of developing decompensation and a median time was also comparable between groups: 21.4% vs. 33.0% (p=0.384) and 18.4 vs. 9.8 years (p=0.053), supported by the Cox regression analysis (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.13–1.48; p=0.187). The presence of IBD was not associated with higher need in liver transplant (18.8% vs. 30.1%; p=0.348), median time was slightly shorter (1.48 vs. 4.73 years; p=0.542), also evidenced by Cox regression (HR 1.40; 95% CI 0.42–4.65; p=0.578). The risk of liver-related death was also not different among the two groups (6.3% vs. 4.4%; p=0.746), and IBD was not a predictor of it (HR 1.94; 95% CI 0.17–21.69; p=0.589). Conclusions The presence of IBD in patients with AIH is rare and do not identify a subgroup of patients with worse response to treatment or poor clinical outcomes. Funding Agencies AbbVie

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicLiver Diseases and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207