Frequency diverse array with random logarithmically increasing frequency offset
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The frequency diverse arrays (FDAs) have been extensively investigated since it can provide a unique angle‐range‐dependent beampattern. This range‐dependent characteristic can suppress the range ambiguous clutters, leading to many novel potential Radar applications. Two issues, however, exist in conventional FDA (CFDA) beampatterns, that is, range‐angle coupling and range periodicity. Therefore, for a CFDA Radar, target range information cannot be obtained directly from the beampattern peaks and target ambiguity occurs in the range domain. In this work, a new frequency diverse array (FDA) transmitter architecture with random logarithmically increasing frequency offset (log‐RFDA) is presented. It is shown that the proposed strategy provides a nonperiodic thumbtack‐like beampattern, eliminating the ambiguity in range domain, suffered in the CFDA Radar. Furthermore, reduced side lobe and higher detection resolution can be achieved, compared with the previously reported log‐FDA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it