MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007672915 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.228

A229 USTEKINUMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF REFRACTORY PEDIATRIC CROHN’S DISEASE: A SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE

2020· article· en· W3007672915 on OpenAlexaffabout
A Cohen, Ana Sant’Anna, N Ahmed

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUstekinumabMedicineCrohn's diseasePsoriasisAdalimumabInternal medicineDiseaseAdverse effectRefractory (planetary science)InfliximabDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Despite the well-established efficacy of Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) antagonists as treatment options for Crohn’s Disease, many pediatric patients need a change in therapy due to adverse events, as well as primary and secondary loss of response, highlighting the necessity for medications with a different mechanism of action. Ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting IL-12 and IL-23, has been approved to treat psoriatic arthritis, plaque psoriasis, and adults with Crohn’s disease. While utekinumab has been shown to be effective in inducing clinical remission in adults with Crohn’s disease refractory to anti-TNF agents, minimal data exists in the pediatric population. Aims We retrospectively describe 11 pediatric patients who received ustekinumab at the Montreal Children’s Hospital with the goal of assessing its efficacy in inducing clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic remission. Methods We abstracted baseline data, prior treatment and response, indications for starting ustekinumab, clinical response, endoscopic data, and laboratory parameters pre- and post- therapy. Clinical response was defined as decrease in abbrPCDAI (Pediatric Crohn’s Disease Activity Index) score. Results Patients ranged in age from 12–17 years old upon initiation of treatment with ustekinumab and had all previously failed either one (N=8) or both (N=3) anti-TNF therapies. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 22 months. We examined three indices of response to ustekinumab: symptomatic improvement, biomarker normalization, and endoscopic changes. Five of eleven patients demonstrated a clinical response – two maintained clinical remission across available follow-up data, while the remaining three experienced a secondary loss of response. The other six patients studied were primary non-responders. Two of these patients had normal abbrPCDAI scores upon initiation of ustekinumab and terminated therapy due to persistent stricturing disease. The other four non-responders either remained unwell or demonstrated clinical worsening, as measured by the abbrPCDAI. Of the clinical responders, 3/5 had elevated CRP values prior to initiating ustekinumab therapy, all of which normalized within one month of clinical improvement. Endoscopic data both pre- and post- ustekinumab was available in two responders and two non-responders, with endoscopic improvement seen in both of the responders and in one of the two non-responders. Conclusions These results demonstrate that ustekinumab has the potential ability to induce not only clinical and biochemical remission, but also endoscopic improvement, in the pediatric population. An area of concern is the fact that only one patient maintained remission for longer than one year. Future research should focus on maximizing and lengthening the effect of ustekinumab, as well as determining factors that influence response to therapy. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207