Blood lactate concentrations following maximal incremental test in male runners with different ages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of age on peak blood lactate concentration following a maximal incremental treadmill test in male recreational runners. Seventy runners from four age groups, ≤25 years; 26-35 years; 36-45 years; >45 years, performed an incremental treadmill test starting at 8 km·h-1, and increasing by 1 km·h-1 every three minutes until volitional exhaustion. Blood samples were collected at baseline and at the zero, third, fifth and seventh minutes after test to determine lactate concentrations. Peak lactate concentration (LApeak) was defined for each participant as the highest value among the four samples. The lactate concentrations were influenced by the participants’ age (r = -0.47), with LApeak of the younger runners (10.8 ± 2.6 mmol·L) being higher than the values for the older age categories (8.1 ± 3.1, 7.0 ± 1.1 and 6.9 ± 2.8 mmol·L for those 26-35, 36-45 and >45 years, respectively). The LApeak occurred more frequently at the third and fifth minute after the initiation of the test. In conclusion, the lactate concentrations were higher in the younger group (< 25) and reached peak more frequently at the third and fifth minute after the incremental test.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".