Homology conundrum among foreguts of caenogastropod molluscs: A view from comparative patterns of development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Evolution of two novel feeding strategies among caenogastropod molluscs, suspension feeding in calyptraeids such as Crepidula fornicata and predatory feeding with a pleurembolic proboscis among neogastropods, may have both involved elongation of the anterior esophagus. Emergence of predatory feeding with a proboscis is particularly significant because it correlates with the rapid adaptive radiation of buccinoidean and muricoidean neogastropods during the Cretaceous. However, the notion that this important evolutionary transition involved elongation of the anterior esophagus to extend down a long proboscis has been disputed by evidence that it may have been the wall of the buccal cavity that elongated. We undertook a comparative study on foregut morphogenesis during larval and metamorphic development in C. fornicata and in three species of neogastropods with a pleurembolic proboscis to examine the hypothesis that the same region of foregut has elongated in all. We approached this by identifying a conserved marker for the boundary between buccal cavity and anterior esophagus, which was recognizable before the developing foregut showed regional differences in length. A survey of four species of littorinimorph caenogastropods suggested that the site of neurogenic placodes for the buccal ganglia could serve as this marker. Results showed that foregut lengthening in C. fornicata involved elongation posterior to neurogenic placodes for buccal ganglia, an area that corresponded to the anterior esophagus in the other littorinimorphs. However, foregut elongation occurred anterior to neurogenic placodes for buccal ganglia in two buccinoidean and one muricoidean neogastropod. The elongated foregut within the pleurembolic proboscis of these neogastropods qualifies as anterior esophagus only if the definition of the anterior esophagus is expanded to include the dorsal folds that run down the roof of the buccal cavity. Regardless of how the anterior esophagus is defined, comparative developmental data do not support the hypothesis of homology between the elongated adult foregut regions in C. fornicata and in neogastropods with a pleurembolic proboscis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".