David Burliuk’s artistic legacy as an object of theoretical analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of the article. To consider the history of futurism who was shaped greatly by David Burliuk, an artist, poet and talented organizer of literary and artistic process in Russia and Ukraine within the 1910–1920s, basing on the set of research works done at the turn of the 21st century. Methodology of the study provides for the application of such main principles as personalization as a structural element of biographical method and dialogue, which allow to deepen and broaden objective knowledge as well as author‘s submission of futurism personalized core. The scientific novelty of the study lies in applying culturological approach tools to the analysis of D. Burliuk‘s artistic and theoretical legacy which is considered as a single phenomenon. Conclusions: 1. It is shown that D. Burliuk‘s creative work as well as his memoirs and the ones of his contemporaries reveal a new opportunity to evaluate objectively the contribution made by this outstanding personality to cultural formation processes in the first quarter of the 20th century. 2. The stud- ies concerning the period of the 1910–1920s are systematized and analyzed; the ideas to be of innovative nature are identified, they concern, on the one hand, the logics of European futurism development (mainly Italian one), but on the other hand, futurism Ukrainian and Russian models identity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it