MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007813706 · doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.00020

Association Between Early Cognitive Impairment and Midterm Functional Outcomes Among Chinese Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Longitudinal Study

2020· article· en· W3007813706 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Juan Li, Jing Wang, Bei Wu, Hanzhang Xu, Xiongfeng Wu, Lanshu Zhou, Benqiang Deng

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neurology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentMedicineCognitionModified Rankin ScaleStroke (engine)Physical therapyRehabilitationSocioeconomic statusLongitudinal studyInternal medicineCognitive impairmentIschemic strokePopulationPsychiatryIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Backgroud: The association between early cognitive impairment and mid-term functional outcomes among Chinese acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients has not been fully explored. Methods: A longitudinal survey focusing on Chinese AIS patients was conducted in three Stroke units in Shanghai, China (July 2016 to June 2017). A total of 185 eligible participants were interviewed at four waves, acute stage, 1, 3, 6 months after onset. The functional outcomes of patients were measured by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and Barthel Index (BI). Their cognitive function was measured by Montreal Cognitive Assessment, ChangshaVersion (MoCA-CS) within 7 days after stroke. Functional outcome was evaluated using mRS and BI at each wave of the interviews. Covariates included patient’s demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status, clinical characteristics of stroke, vascular risk factors, receiving rehabilitation after discharge from acute hospital and recurrence. Generalized linear mixed modles and general linear mixed models were applied. Results: The prevalence of cognitive impairment at acute stage of stroke among these participants was 88.1%. The risk of disability(mRS 2-5) of all participants after stroke decreased over time (OR= 0.491, 95%CI= 0.401-0.603). The risk of disability among those with cognitive impairment increased compared to those with normal cognition (OR= 7.384, 95%CI= 1.041-52.407).The BI score of all participants increased over time after controlling for covariates (β= 1.51, p<0.01). The BI score of those with cognitive impairment was lower than those with normal cognition over the follow-up period after controlling for other covariates (β=-8.11, p<0.05). Conclusions: This study showed that early cognitive impairment was associated with higher risk of disability and poor ADL among Chinese AIS patients. Further studies are needed to examine the linkage between multi-domain cognitive impairment and long-term disability and ADL among stroke survivors by neurophychological test batteries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.939

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeurologySame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207