MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007815509 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.143

A144 A MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM APPROACH REDUCES PEG SITE COMPLICATIONS

2020· article· en· W3007815509 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alexis-Evelyn Truax, Joyce Reardon, Taline Naranian, L W Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDysphagia Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePopulationPEG ratioAdverse effectIntensive care medicineSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Education provided to patients and their family on how to care for the percutaneous enteroscopic gastrotomy (PEG) tube is limited and varies widely. This can result in site and tube complications, patient discomfort and increased health care utilization. In addition, a lack of practitioner expertise and variability in practice can affect timely treatment of PEG site complications. Continuous Levodopa/Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG) has become a standard of treatment option for patients with advanced Parkinson Disease. This medication is delivered by a jejunal tube through a PEG tube (PEG-J). Previous studies in this population reported up to 40% of adverse events related to the PEG site. At Toronto Western Hospital, we developed a multidisciplinary team (MDT), involving a gastroenterologist, a clinical nurse specialist (CNS) with expertise in wound and stoma care and the movement disorder clinical nurse to care for the PEG-J in this patient population. Aims To evaluate the effectiveness of our MDT in reducing PEG site complications and health care utilization. Methods Consecutive PEG-J patients (n=33) assessed by the MDT between October 2018 and September 2019 were provided standard education on the routine care and maintenance of PEG site complications. The CNS uses a systematic approach to prevent, assess and treat PEG site complications. Before and after the MDT approach, patients were seen the day after the PEG insertion (POD 1), 2 weeks after (titration) and then ad hoc determined by incidence of mild, moderate and severe complications. Post implementation of a MDT approach, patients are seen POD 1, at titration and every 3–6 months during routine visits to the Movement Disorder Clinic. Table 1 outlines classification and suggested treatment based on severity for mild, moderate and severe PEG site complications. Results The systematic MDT approach completely eliminated all unscheduled, urgent contact to the health care providers by patients who have been assessed and provided education by the MDT (n=33), including new PEG-J (n=7) and previously inserted PEG-J (n=26). 28.5% of new PEG-J patients had moderate or severe site complication rate, 71.5% had mild or no complications. In the group of patients with previously inserted PEG-J tubes, 58% had moderate or severe site complications, 42% had mild or no complications. Conclusions An interprofessional MDT systematic approach drastically reduces PEG site complications and urgent health care utilization. Patients who receive standardized education pre- and post-insertion have a lower incidence of moderate or severe classification of PEG site complications and unscheduled clinic visits. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicDysphagia Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207