MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007815747 · doi:10.1039/c9fo02674f

Food prototype containing resistant starch type 4 on postprandial glycemic response in healthy adults

2020· article· en· W3007815747 on OpenAlexaff
Yujie Du, Yihong Wu, Di Xiao, Gabriela Maldonado Guzmán, Maria Stewart, Vishnupriya Gourineni, Britt Burton‐Freeman, Indika Edirisinghe

Bibliographic record

VenueFood & Function · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFood composition and properties
Canadian institutionsIngredion (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPostprandialGlycemicResistant starchStarchFood sciencePopulationType 2 diabetesInsulinChemistryMedicineEndocrinologyInternal medicineBiologyDiabetes mellitusEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resistant starch (RS) is a variant of starch that is indigestible by human enzymes and has been acknowledged for multiple physiological benefits including attenuation of postprandial glycemia when incorporated into foods. Distarch phosphate is a RS type 4 (RS4) containing phosphodiester cross-links within and between starch molecules. Considering the importance of RS to human health, the present study aimed to investigate the dose response effect of a novel RS4 (potato-derived distarch phosphate - (VERSAFIBE 1490™) on acute postprandial glycemic responses compared with energy/available carbohydrate and sugar-matched control. The study was designed as a controlled, single-center randomized, single-blinded, cross-over trial, in which 31 healthy adults consumed a baked breakfast cereal bar containing 0, 10 or 20 g RS4 followed by serial blood samples over two hours to determine glucose and insulin concentrations and calculate the incremental area under the curve (iAUC). Results suggest that the addition of RS4 did not reduce iAUC glucose or insulin responses significantly (P > 0.05) at the doses provided. No significant changes in the glucose or insulin maximum concentration (Cmax) and time to reach maximal glucose and insulin concentrations (Tmax) were observed (P > 0.05). Overall, this particular RS4 did not affect measures of glycemia in healthy individuals at doses provided in ready-to-eat baked-good.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Non-randomized triallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Randomized triallow
models splitAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.661

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.

The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.

Study designNon-randomized trial · Randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFood & FunctionSame topicFood composition and propertiesFrench-language works237,207