Controllable Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy: From Circuit Design to Control and Data Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article describes fundamentals of controllable electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (cEIS), from circuit design to control and data analysis. In cEIS, a feedback system controls the process of injecting the excitation signal. We design a two degree-of-freedom robust control system, which guarantees tracking and stability of cEIS in the presence of model uncertainties. This article also addresses the concept of persistently exciting signals. cEIS using current driving mode (CDM) and voltage driving mode, and their differences are highlighted. An online cEIS device is designed and built based on the dc-dc buck converter for batteries online applications, where the excitation signal is superimposed on a dc level. The performance of the fabricated cEIS is evaluated through extensive experiments in CDM. The accuracy of the fabricated cEIS is tested, which results in $\text{0.002}\;\Omega$ root mean square error in the impedance spectra computation of a three-parameter Randles equivalent circuit model (ECM). The performance of the fabricated cEIS is practically verified on a battery cell at different C-rates. First-, second-, and fractional-order Randles ECMs are estimated by using system identification methods, and their impedance spectra are compared with those obtained through the fast Fourier transform.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".