MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008000525 · doi:10.1117/12.2548624

Micro-CT imaging technique to characterize diffusion of small-molecules

2020· article· en· W3008000525 on OpenAlexaff
Tina Khazaee, Chris J. D. Norley, Hristo N. Nikolov, Steven I. Pollmann, David W. Holdsworth

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical Trials
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImaging phantomDiffusionMaterials scienceEffective diffusion coefficientBiomedical engineeringMolecular diffusionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryNuclear medicineChromatographyPhysicsThermodynamicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optimization and characterization of small-molecule diffusion are important in the development of drug-delivery systems. For example, the delivery of local antibiotics is an important component of therapy for orthopedic devicerelated infections (ODRI). However, despite its wide use, the exact elution mechanism is not yet fully understood. In this study, we developed a quantitative, non-destructive, micro-CT technique to characterize 2D diffusion of small-molecules in a tissue-equivalent phantom. Our objective is to use a radio-opaque molecule (Iohexol; molecular weight (MW) 821 Da) as a surrogate for small-molecule antibiotics (e.g., Vancomycin; MW 1449 Da) to characterize diffusion from a finite, cylindrical-core carrier into an agar, tissue-equivalent, sink. A single-phase diffusion experiment was performed to validate our micro-CT imaging method. A two-part phantom consisted of an inner, cylindrical, agar core loaded with Iohexol as a drug-surrogate, directly communicating with an outer annulus of pure agar. The estimate of a single-phase diffusion coefficient for agar was derived from the analysis of 2D radial diffusion distance. We then applied the validated method to evaluate diffusion in two-phases, using calcium-sulphate matrices loaded with Iohexol eluting into an agar tissue-equivalent sink. Image acquisition was performed at regular intervals up to 25 days. Cumulative release amount was used to calculate diffusion coefficients in two-phase phantoms. Iohexol diffusion coefficient was 2.6 ×10-10 m2 s-1, 0.46 ×10-10 m2 s-1, 0.85 ×10-10 m2 s-1 through agar, Stimulan, and Plaster of Paris, respectively. This approach could be used to validate drug delivery in the development of new carrier structures and materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOrthopedic Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207