Canadian Regional Agriculture Model: Positive Mathematical Programming Applied to the Beef Sector in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes the Positive Mathematical Programming (PMP), the method for calibrating models of agricultural livestock production and resource use using a nonlinear total cost function. The PMP method is applied to agricultural sectoral models to study changes in policy and market signals. The Canadian Regional Agriculture Model (CRAM) is a regional, multi-sectoral, comparative static, partial equilibrium, mathematical programming model developed and maintained by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) since mid-eighties. The PMP process converts a linear model using flexibility constraints into a nonlinear model in the absence of the flexibility constraints. A component of CRAM is the beef sector. The elements of the set of total cost curves are defined as quadratic function in terms of the number of cows and calves in the beef production activities. The marginal cost curves are then approximated using the shadow values from linear programming solution with linear curves. Once the flexibility constraints were removed, the model automatically calibrates to the base year production levels. The results from four scenarios indicated the beef sector of CRAM could predict the impact of the scenarios on the size of beef herd. In Scenario 1 where cash costs were increased by 10 percent, the breeding herd size decreased from 3.73 percent in New Brunswick to 0.0 percent in Ontario and Quebec. In Scenario 2 where barley costs were decreased by 10 percent, the breeding herd size increased from 0 percent for British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, Quebec, Prince Edward Island and Nova Scotia to 1.93 percent for New Brunswick. In Scenario 3 where carcass weight per beef cow could be increased by 10 percent, the increase in beef herd size ranged from 0 percent for Ontario and Quebec to 2.56 percent for New Brunswick. In Scenario 4 where world beef prices were increased by 10 percent increase in beef herd size ranged from 4.48 percent for Manitoba to 25.78 percent for New Brunswick.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".