Mechanisms of Cardiovascular Toxicity of BCR-ABL1 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia, with many patients achieving major clinical and molecular responses without complications. While typically well-tolerated, clinical experience with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (particularly those of the second and third generations) has highlighted unanticipated associations with serious non-cancer adverse effects on various organs, particularly the cardiovascular system. RECENT FINDINGS: Herein, we review the current literature surrounding the major cardiovascular toxicities of BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myelogenous leukemia, discuss potential mechanisms underpinning their development, and suggest future research directions to uncover novel ways to reduce cardiovascular events in patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. As a whole, while cardiovascular toxicities are well-documented, the mechanistic basis of these clinical observations remains poorly defined. In turn, to provide safe and effective treatment to all patients, it is necessary to close the knowledge gap regarding mechanisms that drive toxicity and elucidate the complex interactions that predispose specific individuals to these toxicities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it