Takayasu Arteritis Mistaken for Epilepsy: A Case Presenting With Convulsive Syncope
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Takayasu arteritis (TA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by granulomatous vasculitis that predominantly manifests as panaortitis. This occlusive thromboaortopathy lacks pathognomonic features often resulting in a diagnostic dilemma leading to its under-recognition, misdiagnosis and delayed management. Although neurological manifestations are not uncommon in TA, convulsive syncope as an initial clinical presentation is extremely rare. We report a case of convulsive syncope as a manifesting symptom of TA. A 17-year-old male patient of African origin was referred to us from an upcountry regional hospital with a diagnosis of medically intractable epilepsy for cardiovascular review. He presented with a 28-week history of generalized tonic-clonic seizures followed by loss of consciousness. He denied history of recurrent headaches, fever, visual disturbances, arthralgias, claudication or unintentional weight loss. Physical examination revealed feeble left-sided brachial and radial pulses, elevated blood pressure, differences in blood pressure between arms and left-sided carotid and vertebral bruits. Computed tomography angiogram of his thoracic and abdominal aorta revealed changes suggestive of a diffuse arteritis. Additionally, magnetic resonance angiogram of the brain revealed total occlusion of the left common carotid, left internal carotid, left external carotid and left vertebral arteries. Based on the physical examination and radiological findings, we reached a diagnosis of TA. He was prescribed dexamethasone, methotrexate, acetylsalicylic acid and amlodipine. He had a remarkable recovery and was seizure-free for the last 5 months after discharge. TA may manifest with convulsive syncope mimicking epilepsy. Despite its rarity, presentations of this nature continue to challenge clinicians resulting in delayed diagnosis with irreversible life-threatening consequences to patients. In view of this, physicians should strive to take detailed history and perform thorough physical examination so as to timely pick the characteristic signs of TA especially in patients presenting with unanticipated symptoms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".