MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3008148985 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.050

A51 UTILIZING MUCIN-DERIVED SUGARS CONFERS A FITNESS ADVANTAGE TO THE ENTERIC PATHOGEN CITROBACTER RODENTIUM THAT PROMOTES INTESTINAL COLONIZATION

2020· article· en· W3008148985 on OpenAlexaff
M Mslati, Qiaochu Liang, Haitao Yu, Chenhui Ma, Bruce A. Vallance

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicProbiotics and Fermented Foods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitrobacter rodentiumMicrobiologyBiologyPathogenMucusCecumSialic acidBiochemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Citrobacter rodentium is an enteric murine pathogen used to model the human diarrheal pathogens. Following inoculation, C. rodentium colonizes the mouse cecum where it expands and ultimately spreads to the distal colon. During this process, C. rodentium has to compete with commensal microbes for available nutrients. Moreover, to spread throughout the gut, and infect the intestinal epithelium, C. rodentium has to cross through, and or dwell within the intestinal mucus layer which is composed of the heavily glycosylated protein Muc2. Muc-2 is glycosylated and coated by 5 distinct terminal sugar residues: galactose, N-acetylgalactosamine, N-acetylglucosamine, fucose, and sialic acid. Many commensal microbes have the ability to cleave and free these sugars from the Muc2 protein, releasing them for their own consumption, however pathogens appear to exploit this process. While studies have indicated that C. rodentium uses these terminal sugar residues as a nutritional source, their relative importance in the pathogenic strategy of C. rodentium (and other gut pathogens) remains unclear Aims Investigate the role played by mucin sugar residues in controlling C. rodentium pathogenesis Methods Deletions of agaW, nagE, mglB, galP, fucK, and nanT were generated on the chromosome of C. rodentium (Strepr) by overlap extension PCR. Growth assays were performed to examine the growth kinetics of mutants C. rodentium in minimal (M9) media supplemented with one of the 5 mucin sugars or M9 with whole mucin as control. Specific pathogen free (SPF) C57BL/6 mice, or germfree C57BL/6 mice were orally gavaged with wildtype C. rodentium (Strepr) or one of ΔagaW, ΔnagE, ΔmglB, ΔgalP, ΔfucK, or ΔnanT strains. Mice were euthanized at 6 days post-infection, and the cecum, colon, and spleen were collected and histologically scored for pathology and intestinal and systemic bacterial burden. Stool samples were collected throughout the 6 days to quantify C. rodentium burdens Results Growth assays confirmed that the specific sugar transporter/kinase mutant C. rodentium strains grew normally when placed in media supplemented with whole mucin, or with most sugars, only showing overt defects in growth when solely supplemented with the sugar for which they were impaired. Several of the C. rodentium mutants including ΔnanT showed overt defects in colonization/infection of SPF C57BL/6 mice, but their pathogenesis was normalized in germfree mice, or in mice treated with the antibiotic streptomycin at each day post-infection. These findings indicate that the impact of mucin sugar utilization on C. rodentium virulence is microbiota-dependent Conclusions C. rodentium uses mucin sugars as nutrient source in the mouse gut, and an inability to use these sugars impairs their ability to infect their hosts in a microbiota dependent manner Funding Agencies CAG, CCC, CIHR, NRC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicProbiotics and Fermented Foods→French-language works237,207→