MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008159457 · doi:10.1117/12.2546707

Inner-cladding pump reflector based on chirped volume Bragg gratings

2020· article· en· W3008159457 on OpenAlexaff
Lauris Talbot, Louis-Charles Michaud, Vincent Boulanger, Pascal Paradis, Martin Bernier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic Crystal and Fiber Optics
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceOpticsFiber Bragg gratingDistributed Bragg reflectorCladding (metalworking)Volume (thermodynamics)PHOSFOSReflector (photography)OptoelectronicsOptical fiberPhysicsFiber optic sensorComposite materialGraded-index fiber

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cladding-pumping scheme has made the power scalability of rare-earth-doped fiber lasers up to record levels possible by distributing the pump absorption along much longer fiber lengths. However, in addition to increasing the fiber cost and the cavity losses, a longer cavity length leads to enhanced detrimental nonlinear effects such as stimulated Raman scattering. As a way to reduce the required length of such lasers, we propose here an all-fiber laser architecture that makes use of a femtosecond-written chirped inner-cladding Bragg grating (ICBG) as a residual pump reflector. We report a 73% reflectivity of the pump power propagating in the highly multimode 125 μm-diameter inner cladding of the fiber made out of pure silica. This component was inscribed by using 400 nm femtosecond pulses and the phase-mask technique. Such a reflectivity was reached by optimizing the chirp of the grating and by inserting the fiber inside a hollow capillary with an outside diameter of 1 mm during the inscription. The latter reduces greatly the impact of the fiber’s curvature on the refraction of the writing beam. A larger writing area and consequently a stronger reflectivity could therefore be reached. The presence of this component at the output of a 21 m long erbium-doped silica fiber laser operating at 1.6 μm increased its slope efficiency from 20.5 to 25.1 % with respect to the injected pump power and increased its output from 22.8 to 29 W at 115 W of pump power.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.783
Threshold uncertainty score0.625

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotonic Crystal and Fiber OpticsFrench-language works237,207