MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3008218959 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.034

A35 MICROBIAL PROTEOLYTIC SIGNATURE IN ULCERATIVE COLITIS INDUCES AN INFLAMMATORY SIGNATURE IN MICROBIOTA-HUMANIZED MICE

2020· article· en· W3008218959 on OpenAlexaff
Heather J. Galipeau, Williams Turpin, A Caminero Fernandez, Alba Santiago, Josie Libertucci, Miriam Bermúdez-Brito, Sarah Armstrong, Larbi Bedrani, Kenneth Croitoru, Elena F. Verdú

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of TorontoMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProteasesUlcerative colitisDysbiosisFecesMetagenomicsBiologyCalprotectinImmunologyMicrobiomeColitisNeutrophil elastaseMicrobiologyGut floraElastaseInflammatory bowel diseaseProteolytic enzymesInflammationMedicineInternal medicineBioinformaticsGeneEnzymeGeneticsDiseaseBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Altered gut microbiota composition has been associated with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) including ulcerative colitis (UC), but causality and bacterially-driven mechanisms, are unclear. Proteases within the gastrointestinal tract play a critical role in maintaining homeostasis and are tightly regulated by anti-proteases. Host-derived proteolytic imbalances have been described in IBD, including UC, however, the role of intestinal microbiota as a source of proteases and anti-proteases has largely been ignored. Aims To study microbial proteolytic activity and intestinal microbiota profiles in a cohort of individuals at-risk for IBD, and in those individuals that develop UC at follow-up. Methods Fecal samples were collected from healthy individuals at-risk for IBD and who went on to develop UC (pre-UC; n=14) and again after UC diagnosis (post-UC, n=10). Fecal samples from matched at-risk individuals that did not develop UC were used as healthy controls (n=52). Overall fecal proteolytic and elastolytic activity was measured. We performed metagenomics sequencing in 4 UC subjects (pre and post) and 4 matched HC using Illumina Hi-Seq from stool DNA. To investigate bacterial origin and functional significance, pregnant germ-free (GF) mice were colonized with a fecal sample from a selected UC subject (pre and post) and a matched HC. Naturally colonized litters were followed for 12 weeks, after which proteolytic activities and signs of inflammation were measured. Results Fecal proteolytic and elastase activity was increased in pre- and post-UC samples compared to HCs. Metagenomics revealed over 20k genes were significantly different between HC and pre-UC samples, and of these, 440 related to proteases and peptidases. Increased fecal proteolytic activity, higher lipocalin levels, and increased colonic polymorphonuclear cells in colonic H&E sections was observed in pre- and post-UC colonized mice compared to HC colonized mice. Mice colonized with pre-UC microbiota showed increased mRNA expression of genes linked to immunological disease, antimicrobial and inflammatory responses (ie. Tlr2, Tlr5, Nod2, and Il1b) as compared to HC colonized mice. Conclusions These results suggest increased fecal proteolytic activity is observed prior to the onset and clinical diagnosis of UC in patients at-risk for IBD, and upon transfer to mice born from colonized GF dams, low-grade inflammation develops. These pathways could be developed as novel non-invasive biomarkers to monitor at-risk populations. Submitted on behalf of the CCC-GEM Project consortium. Supported by CCC GIA to EF Verdu Funding Agencies CCC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→