Terapia hortícola-horticultura educativa social y terapéutica: Situación actual y retos de futuro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El uso de la horticultura como terapia y como instrumento educativo y socializador, con entidad propia y diferenciadora, tiene desde hace mas de medio siglo una amplia implantacion y reconocimiento en paises como Reino Unido, Irlanda, Alemania, Canada, Estados Unidos, etc. La Terapia Horticola es una disciplina encuadrada dentro de las ciencias socio-sanitarias, con titulacion especifica en diversos paises. Combina un amplio elenco de conocimientos sobre discapacidad fisica, cognitiva y sensorial, diversas patologias, trastornos psicosociales, necesidades especiales de aprendizaje, etc.., asi como de agricultura, jardineria, paisajismo, educacion ambiental y actividades afines. La horticultura en programas de terapia y rehabilitacion profesionalmente dirigidos por terapeutas horticolas, se convierte asi en un vehiculo para desarrollar o recuperar la autonomia personal, integrando el aprendizaje de habilidades basicas (alfabetizacion, aritmetica, etc.), mejorando el funcionamiento fisico y cognitivo, abordando habilidades sociales, incorporando habitos de vida saludables, etc., en un entorno al aire libre para lograr el bienestar fisico y mental.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".