MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008380414 · doi:10.1159/000504975

First Trimester Protein Biomarkers for Risk of Spontaneous Preterm Birth: Identifying a Critical Need for More Rigorous Approaches to Biomarker Identification and Validation

2020· article· en· W3008380414 on OpenAlexaff
Arlene D’Silva, Jon Hyett, Jens R. Coorssen

Bibliographic record

VenueFetal Diagnosis and Therapy · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPreterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBiomarkerIdentification (biology)ObstetricsPregnancyBioinformaticsBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous preterm birth is the leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide and continues to present a major clinical dilemma. We previously reported that a number of protein species were dysregulated in maternal serum collected at 11-13+6 weeks' gestation from pregnancies that continued to labour spontaneously and deliver preterm. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: In this study, we aimed to validate changes seen in 4 candidate protein species: alpha-1-antitrypsin, vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP), alpha-1beta-glycoprotein and apolipoprotein A-1 in a larger cohort of women using a western blot approach. RESULTS: Serum levels of all 4 proteins were reduced in women who laboured spontaneously and delivered preterm. This reduction was significant for VDBP (p = 0.04), which has been shown to be involved in a plethora of essential biological functions, including actin scavenging, fatty acid transport, macrophage activation and chemotaxis. CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in select proteoforms of VDBP may result in an imbalance in the optimal intrauterine environment for the developing foetus as well as to a successful uncomplicated pregnancy. Thus, certain (phosphorylated) species of VDBP may be of value in developing a targeted approach to the early prediction of spontaneous preterm labour. Importantly, this study raises the importance of a focus on proteoforms and the need for any biomarker validation process to most effectively take these into account rather than the more widespread practice of simply focussing on the primary amino acid sequence of a protein.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.043
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.054
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.226

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0430.054
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFetal Diagnosis and TherapySame topicPreterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisFrench-language works237,207