MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008550575 · doi:10.3168/jds.2019-17905

Technical note: Extrapolation of hepatic glycogen concentration of the whole organ by performing a liver biopsy

2020· article· en· W3008550575 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Duplessis, Lya Blais, William Poisson, C.L. Girard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité de SherbrookeAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsGlycogenLiver LobeLobeInternal medicineEndocrinologyAnimal scienceChemistryBiologyMedicineAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glycogen, a complex polysaccharide, is the form of storage of glucose in mammals that can be released rapidly when needed. Recent studies have mainly reported hepatic glycogen concentration for early-lactating cows, when the energy demand is higher than the energy supply from dry matter intake, driving the cow to use the energy stored as hepatic glycogen. Generally, liver samples are obtained through percutaneous needle biopsies in the right lobe of the liver. Our objective was to analyze the variation of glycogen concentration in the livers of Holstein and Jersey cows among different liver locations representing all lobes, to evaluate whether samples obtained by liver biopsies are representative of the whole organ. Liver from 10 culled lactating cows (5 Holstein and 5 Jersey cows) from 30 to 113 mo of age at slaughter were obtained. Each liver was sampled no more than 3 h after death on the following sites: 3 sites in the right lobe (1 to 3), 2 in the diaphragmatic surface of the left lobe (4 and 5), 3 in the visceral surface of the left lobe (6 to 8), 1 in the quadrate lobe (9), and 1 in the caudate lobe (10). Samples were snap frozen in liquid N2 and were then analyzed for glucose concentration after conversion of glycogen to glucose using amyloglucosidase (EC 3.2.1.3). Glycogen results are reported as grams of glucose per 100 g of wet weight of liver (i.e., percent of wet weight of liver). Liver weights averaged 5.1 [standard deviation (SD) 1.2, minimum 3.3, maximum 6.2] kg for Holstein and 6.0 (SD 1.8, minimum 4.7, maximum 8.9) kg for Jersey cows. Holstein cows [1.31, standard error of the mean (SEM) 0.05% of wet weight] had greater liver glycogen concentration than did Jersey cows (0.75, SEM 0.05% of wet weight). No significant difference was noted among the 10 liver locations regarding glycogen concentration and averaged, for both breeds, 1.03% of wet weight (SEM 0.10). These results suggest that, in dairy cows, percutaneous needle liver biopsy in the right lobe is an accurate technique to fairly extrapolate glycogen concentration of the whole organ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.473
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207