MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008554560 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.048

A49 CO-INFECTION WITH PARASITIC WORMS ENHANCES THE ABILITY OF SALMONELLA TO COLONIZE THE GUT LUMEN AND DEWORMING RESTORES COLONIZATION RESISTANCE TO SALMONELLA

2020· article· en· W3008554560 on OpenAlexaff
Tara P. Brosschot, Katherine M. Lawrence, Mia H. E. Kennedy, Rachael D. FitzPatrick, Brandon E. Moeller, Jun Han, Christoph H. Borchers, Lisa A. Reynolds

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicParasites and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalmonellaSalmonella infectionBiologyHelminthsMicrobiologyDewormingSalmonella entericaHeligmosomoides polygyrusColonizationImmunologyHelminthiasisColonisation resistanceBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Chronic infections with intestinal helminths occur primarily in world regions where infections with bacterial pathogens are also common. Research so far has shown that helminths can promote bacterial infection, however, the precise mechanisms of this are unknown. Current helminth control strategies involve mass deworming programs, and it is as yet unclear how deworming impacts susceptibility to bacterial infections in helminth-affected areas. Aims Our aims were to decipher the mechanistic details by which helminths can promote intestinal bacterial infection, and to determine how deworming affects susceptibility to intestinal colonization by bacterial pathogens. Methods Using a mouse model of enteric helminth-bacterial coinfection, we examined how the small intestinal helminth Heligmosomoides polygyrus promotes intestinal colonization by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurim. To study the effect of deworming of concurrent Salmonella infection, we treated our helminth-infected mice with the anthelmintic drug Strongid P both before and after Salmonella (co-) infection. To examine whether heightened Salmonella colonization during helminth infection depended on the ability of Salmonella to invade host tissue, we compared the ability of wild-type Salmonella or an invasion-deficient mutant (ΔinvA) to colonize during helminth co-infection. Results An ongoing helminth infection resulted in high levels of Salmonella in the small intestine after co-infection, however, when mice were dewormed prior to Salmonella co-infection, they were no longer susceptible to high small intestinal Salmonella burdens. In contrast, when helminth-infected mice are dewormed after Salmonella has already co-colonized, high Salmonella burdens persisted in the small intestine. Further, we found that during helminth co-infection, Salmonella primarily expands in the gut lumen rather than in the small intestinal tissue, and in line with this, a Salmonella invasion mutant was able to colonize the intestine to a similar extent to wild-type Salmonella during helminth infection. Conclusions Deworming experiments have revealed that the effects of H. polygyrus on promoting Salmonella colonization in the small intestines depend on the ongoing presence of the helminth. Deworming did not revert bacterial burdens once Salmonella had colonized, suggesting that an ongoing helminth infection reduces colonization resistance to Salmonella infection but was not required for Salmonella to persist after initial colonization by Salmonella. Further, we discovered that Salmonella expansion during helminth infection is independent of bacterial invasion of host tissue. Funding Agencies CIHR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicParasites and Host InteractionsFrench-language works237,207