MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008639934 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.160

A161 MACROSCOPIC AND HISTOLOGY FINDINGS DURING UPPER DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY IN CHILDREN WITH SUSPICION OF CELIAC DISEASE AND HIGH LEVELS OF TRANSGLUTAMINASE IGA-ANTIBODY

2020· article· en· W3008639934 on OpenAlexaffabout
Prévost Jantchou, M Dirks, Kelly Grzywacz, V Marchand, Ugur Halac, Véronique Groleau, Natalie Patey, Dorothée Dal Soglio, Luc L. Oligny, Éric Drouin, C Deslandres

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCeliac Disease Research and Management
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHepatologyGastroenterologyVillous atrophyInternal medicineTissue transglutaminaseEndoscopyPediatric gastroenterologyUpper endoscopyDuodenal bulbCohortCoeliac diseaseDuodenumDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition suggests that the diagnosis of Celiac disease (CD) can be confirmed solely on the basis of clinical symptoms and bloodwork including a level of transglutaminase IgA-antibodies (TGA) ≥ 10 times the upper limit of normal (10XN). In Canada and the United States, this recommendation has not been endorsed. We recently demonstrated that TGA ≥ 10XN performed at our institution (INOVA Diagnostics’ Quanta Lite) was a reliable predictive test of villous atrophy in patients with suspicion of CD. Aims The aim of the present study was to investigate the rate of supplemental endoscopic or histological findings in a cohort of children with TGA ≥ 10XN and the association of these findings with clinical symptoms. Methods Consecutive children with suspected CD who had an endoscopy between 2011 and 2018 were included in this analysis. Data was extracted from our CD database. The macroscopic and histological findings were reported. We compared these diagnoses to the clinical symptoms. Results From 2011 to 2018, 405 new cases of CD were identified in our pediatric center. In total, 238 (58.7%) patients had baseline TGA levels ≥ 10XN (67.2% females, median (IQR) age 8.4 (4.8–12.2)). The median interval between the first visit to the gastroenterology unit and the endoscopy was 43.0 (21.0–78.0) days. In total, 58% of the endoscopies had macroscopic findings in the bulb (37.8 %) or the duodenum (41.5%) including a mosaic pattern, mucosal fissuring, or erythema. Seven cases (2.8%) of esophagitis were identified during endoscopy; histological analysis confirmed eosinophilic esophagitis in 3 cases (1.2%) and peptic esophagitis in 4 cases. Non-specific gastritis was present in 58 patients (24.4%) and 2 cases of Helicobacter pylori infection were identified. The biopsies showed subtotal/total villous atrophy of duodenum in 171 (71.8%) or partial villous atrophy in 51 patients (29.8 %). Ten patients (4,3%) had villous atrophy in the duodenal bulb alone, with normal biopsies of the second part of the duodenum. Abdominal pain did not correlate with gastritis or duodenitis. However, children with diarrhea had a greater prevalence of visible endoscopic inflammation in the duodenum than those without diarrhea: 53.5% vs 38.9% respectively; P= 0,037. Conclusions Apart from the classical features associated with CD, the supplementary diagnostic yield of endoscopy was low. There were only a few cases of additional diseases identified by the endoscopic procedure in a large cohort of children and adolescents with suspicion of CD. Therefore, these results support the no-biopsy approach in the settings of TGA ≥ 10XN using a reliable diagnostic kit. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicCeliac Disease Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207