MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008652052 · doi:10.1061/9780784482810.025

Seismic Displacement Assessment of New Facilities for Post-Disaster Operation at a Wastewater Treatment Plant

2020· article· en· W3008652052 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeo-Congress 2020 · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsKlohn Crippen Berger (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisplacement (psychology)WastewaterEnvironmental scienceSewage treatmentWaste managementComputer scienceEngineeringEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New developments are planned at an existing wastewater treatment plant, which provides secondary treatment of the liquid stream for about one million residents and businesses. Existing facilities at the 45-year old plant were designed based on various versions of the building code in effect at the time of construction, and each expansion was designed to a different level of seismic performance. As part of the new expansion phase, additional gravity thickeners are proposed in an area of the site surrounded by several older facilities. The proposed gravity thickeners are designed for post-disaster operation after the design earthquake without adversely affecting the performance of the existing facilities. A suite of 15 spectrally matched ground motions were developed for the 2,475 year design return period, and nonlinear seismic deformation analyses were performed using the finite difference program FLAC and effective stress-based constitutive model UBCSAND. As per conventional local practice, time histories representing the average and upper bound estimates of the Arias intensity and significant duration were identified from the 15 earthquakes during preliminary design, and seismic-induced displacements of the facilities were evaluated. Subsequently, the performance of the structures was assessed under all 15 time histories. The analyses showed that the initial selection of time histories based on the average and upper bound Arias intensity and significant duration did not correspond to the average and upper bound displacements under all 15 time histories. It is evident that conventional selection of earthquake records may not result in the examination of the most critical displacement cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.781

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it