MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008764722 · doi:10.3390/genes11020235

Comprehensive Sequence Analysis of IQD Gene Family and their Expression Profiling in Grapevine (Vitis vinifera)

2020· article· en· W3008764722 on OpenAlexaff
Zhongjie Liu, Muhammad Salman Haider, Nadeem Khan, Jinggui Fang

Bibliographic record

VenueGenes · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHorticultural and Viticultural Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBiologyGeneGene familyGeneticsGene duplicationGenomeArabidopsisBimolecular fluorescence complementationComplementationGene expression profilingGene expressionPhenotypeMutant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The plant-specific IQ67-domain (IQD) protein family members are downstream targets of calcium sensors, known to regulate plant growth and lateral organ polarity, and basal defense response against environmental cues. No systematic study of IQD gene family has been performed on grapevine. The public availability of grapevine genome enables us to perform identification, phylogeny, chromosomal orientation, and gene structure analysis of the IQD genes in grapevine. We identified 49 VvIQD genes (VvIQD1–VvIQD49) and further classified them into eight subgroups based on phylogenetic relationships. The 49 VvIQD genes were assigned to 19 different chromosomal positions. The collinear relationship between grapevine and Arabidopsis IQDs (VvIQD and AtIQD), and within grapevine VvIQDs, was highly conserved. In addition, most of duplicated gene pairs showed Ka/Ks ratio less than 1.00, indicating purifying selection within these gene pairs, implying functional discrepancy after duplication. Transcription profiling of VvIQD genes shed light on their specific role in grapevine tissue and organ development. The qRT-PCR validation of the 49 VvIQD genes in grape berry tissue from cultivars with distinct berry shape during developmental phases suggested candidate genes involved in the shape of grape berries. The subcellular prediction of VvIQD22, VvIQD23, VvIQD38, and VvIQD49 genes validated their localization in the nucleus and plasma membrane. The VvIQD49 protein interaction with VvCaM2 was also verified by bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) analysis in the plasma membrane. Our findings will be valuable for the functional genomic studies for desirable shape development of grape berries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.444
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenesSame topicHorticultural and Viticultural ResearchFrench-language works237,207