MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008773304 · doi:10.1061/9780784482834.007

Examining the Liquefaction Resistance of Lightly Cemented Sands Using Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP)

2020· article· en· W3008773304 on OpenAlex
Minyong Lee, Michael G. Gomez, Maya El Kortbawi, Katerina Ziotopoulou

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeo-Congress 2020 · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial Applications in Construction Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCementation (geology)LiquefactionShearing (physics)CalciteGeotechnical engineeringSoil waterCalcium carbonateGeologyCompactionShear modulusMaterials scienceMineralogyComposite materialSoil scienceCement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP), or bio-cementation, is a bio-mediated, environmentally-conscious soil improvement technology that can improve the engineering properties of granular soils through the precipitation of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) on soil particle surfaces and contacts. While past studies have shown the potential of bio-cementation to improve the resistance of granular soils to earthquake-induced soil liquefaction, the spectrum of behaviors during the transition from the uncemented to lightly cemented conditions has remained poorly characterized. In this study, a series of direct simple shear tests were performed to improve our understanding of the effect of CaCO3 bio-cementation on the liquefaction triggering and post-triggering strain accumulation behavior of loose sands. A poorly-graded Ottawa F-65 sand material was treated to varying degrees of very light bio-cementation and subjected to undrained cyclic shearing events. All specimens were cemented and sheared under a vertical effective stress of 100 kPa and subjected to cyclic stress ratios (CSR) of 0.1 and 0.2. During these tests, shear wave velocity (Vs) measurements were completed to non-destructively monitor cementation progression and degradation during shearing. Results suggest that even very light levels of bio-cementation (ΔVs ≈ 0 to 100 m/s) can significantly increase the number of cycles needed to trigger soil liquefaction (3% single amplitude shear strain), e.g., a 10-fold increase in the number of cycles needed to trigger liquefaction was observed when Vs values were increased by only 25 m/s. Despite this significant improvement in small-strain pre-triggering behavior, little improvement was observed with respect to strain accumulation before and after initial triggering. While additional testing is needed, results from this study can improve our understanding of the behavior of lightly bio-cemented and naturally-cemented soils subjected to earthquake-induced undrained cyclic loading.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it