MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3008796212 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.169

A170 VITAMIN D IN IBD PATIENTS – A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW

2020· review· en· W3008796212 on OpenAlexaffabout
R A MacMillan, Terry Ponich

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVitamin D and neurologyUlcerative colitisInflammatory bowel diseaseInternal medicineCalprotectinGastroenterologyvitamin D deficiencyPopulationRetrospective cohort studyCrohn's diseaseFaecal calprotectinDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Vitamin D is a critical factor in bone remodelling, calcium absorption and may promote anti-inflammatory cytokines in the gut. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with a reduction in serum Vitamin D levels and a chronic inflammatory state, both of which are strong risk factors for bone density loss affecting IBD patients. Despite European and North American IBD maintenance guidelines for Vitamin D monitoring and bone density scans, there are limited North American investigations into factors influencing serum Vitamin D levels in the IBD patient population specifically. Aims We investigated whether patient demographics, disease severity indexes and/or inflammatory markers were linked to low serum Vitamin D levels in our IBD patients. We also established the extent of Vitamin D serum deficiencies and supplementation rates in our IBD patients. Methods A retrospective chart review of a single clinician’s practice at London Health Science Centre, Victoria Hospital, over the past 20 months, was performed to: 1) assess the frequency of low serum 25-OH Vitamin D (25-OH D) in the IBD patient population and 2) determine whether patient disease severity was linked to lower 25-OH D levels. A multivariate regression analysis was performed assessing Crohn’s Disease (CD) or Ulcerative Colitis (UC) patient factors: age, sex, disease duration, seasonality, current pharmacologic treatments, past surgeries, CD Activity Index, UC Mayo score, C-reactive protein, and fecal calprotectin (Fcal) level. Results 175 IBD patients had at least one 25-OH D measurement with 71 patients actively on Vitamin D therapy. Of UC and CD patients who were not on Vitamin D therapy, 63% (17/27) and 79% (61/77) were 25-OH D deficient, respectively. 25-OH D levels in the CD population was associated with Vitamin D supplementation (regression coefficient [RC] 23.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 14.54 to 33.45), summer season ([RC] 9.90, [CI] 0.56 to 19.24), and past bowel resection ([RC] -10.61, [CI] -20.48 to -0.76). 25-OH D levels in the UC population was associated with Vitamin D supplementation (regression coefficient [RC] 47.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 27.62 to 66.83), and Mayo severity scores ([RC] -23.01, [CI] -41.82 to -4.20). Fcal (78 patients) was inversely associated with 25-OH D levels but the trend was not significant. Conclusions Overall, 25-OH D levels were lower in both the UC and CD patient populations relative to the already deficient Canadian population. However, IBD patients are responsive to Vitamin D supplementation. Tools with more objective evidence of disease severity such as UC Mayo score and fcal should be prioritized for identifying the IBD population requiring supplementation. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→