Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Vitamin D is a critical factor in bone remodelling, calcium absorption and may promote anti-inflammatory cytokines in the gut. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with a reduction in serum Vitamin D levels and a chronic inflammatory state, both of which are strong risk factors for bone density loss affecting IBD patients. Despite European and North American IBD maintenance guidelines for Vitamin D monitoring and bone density scans, there are limited North American investigations into factors influencing serum Vitamin D levels in the IBD patient population specifically. Aims We investigated whether patient demographics, disease severity indexes and/or inflammatory markers were linked to low serum Vitamin D levels in our IBD patients. We also established the extent of Vitamin D serum deficiencies and supplementation rates in our IBD patients. Methods A retrospective chart review of a single clinician’s practice at London Health Science Centre, Victoria Hospital, over the past 20 months, was performed to: 1) assess the frequency of low serum 25-OH Vitamin D (25-OH D) in the IBD patient population and 2) determine whether patient disease severity was linked to lower 25-OH D levels. A multivariate regression analysis was performed assessing Crohn’s Disease (CD) or Ulcerative Colitis (UC) patient factors: age, sex, disease duration, seasonality, current pharmacologic treatments, past surgeries, CD Activity Index, UC Mayo score, C-reactive protein, and fecal calprotectin (Fcal) level. Results 175 IBD patients had at least one 25-OH D measurement with 71 patients actively on Vitamin D therapy. Of UC and CD patients who were not on Vitamin D therapy, 63% (17/27) and 79% (61/77) were 25-OH D deficient, respectively. 25-OH D levels in the CD population was associated with Vitamin D supplementation (regression coefficient [RC] 23.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 14.54 to 33.45), summer season ([RC] 9.90, [CI] 0.56 to 19.24), and past bowel resection ([RC] -10.61, [CI] -20.48 to -0.76). 25-OH D levels in the UC population was associated with Vitamin D supplementation (regression coefficient [RC] 47.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 27.62 to 66.83), and Mayo severity scores ([RC] -23.01, [CI] -41.82 to -4.20). Fcal (78 patients) was inversely associated with 25-OH D levels but the trend was not significant. Conclusions Overall, 25-OH D levels were lower in both the UC and CD patient populations relative to the already deficient Canadian population. However, IBD patients are responsive to Vitamin D supplementation. Tools with more objective evidence of disease severity such as UC Mayo score and fcal should be prioritized for identifying the IBD population requiring supplementation. Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".