Algorithms and Lower Bounds for De Morgan Formulas of Low-Communication Leaf Gates
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The class FORMULA[s]∘G consists of Boolean functions computable by size- s De Morgan formulas whose leaves are any Boolean functions from a class G. We give lower bounds and (SAT, Learning, and pseudorandom generators ( PRG s )) algorithms for FORMULA[n 1.99 ]∘G, for classes G of functions with low communication complexity . Let R (k) G be the maximum k -party number-on-forehead randomized communication complexity of a function in G. Among other results, we show the following: • The Generalized Inner Product function GIP k n cannot be computed in FORMULA[s]° G on more than 1/2+ε fraction of inputs for s=o(n 2 /k⋅4 k ⋅R (k) (G)⋅log(n/ε)⋅log(1/ε)) 2 ). This significantly extends the lower bounds against bipartite formulas obtained by [62]. As a corollary, we get an average-case lower bound for GIP k n against FORMULA[n 1.99 ]∘PTF k −1 , i.e., sub-quadratic-size De Morgan formulas with degree-k-1) PTF ( polynomial threshold function ) gates at the bottom. Previously, it was open whether a super-linear lower bound holds for AND of PTFs. • There is a PRG of seed length n/2+O(s⋅R (2) (G)⋅log(s/ε)⋅log(1/ε)) that ε-fools FORMULA[s]∘G. For the special case of FORMULA[s]∘LTF, i.e., size- s formulas with LTF ( linear threshold function ) gates at the bottom, we get the better seed length O(n 1/2 ⋅s 1/4 ⋅log(n)⋅log(n/ε)). In particular, this provides the first non-trivial PRG (with seed length o(n)) for intersections of n halfspaces in the regime where ε≤1/n, complementing a recent result of [45]. • There exists a randomized 2 n-t #SAT algorithm for FORMULA[s]∘G, where t=Ω(n\√s⋅log 2 (s)⋅R (2) (G))/1/2. In particular, this implies a nontrivial #SAT algorithm for FORMULA[n 1.99 ]∘LTF. • The Minimum Circuit Size Problem is not in FORMULA[n 1.99 ]∘XOR; thereby making progress on hardness magnification, in connection with results from [14, 46]. On the algorithmic side, we show that the concept class FORMULA[n 1.99 ]∘XOR can be PAC-learned in time 2 O(n/log n) .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it