MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008846417 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.020

A21 VITAMIN D DEFICIENCY AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS

2020· article· en· W3008846417 on OpenAlexaffabout
S Wang, Aldo J. Montaño‐Loza, Maryam Ebadi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Diseases and Immunity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineGastroenterologyPrimary sclerosing cholangitisUnivariate analysisvitamin D deficiencyVitamin D and neurologyCirrhosisLiver transplantationLiver diseasePrimary biliary cirrhosisChronic liver diseaseProportional hazards modelVitaminTransplantationDiseaseMultivariate analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a progressive cholestatic disease involving chronic inflammation and fibrosis of intra- and extra-hepatic ducts. Vitamin D is a secosteroid implicated in anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic pathways, and its deficiency has been associated with worse outcomes in chronic liver disease. Vitamin D status may also influence the course of PSC but studies evaluating this link are scarce. Aims To determine the association of vitamin D deficiency with the development of cirrhosis, mortality, and need for liver transplantation in patients with PSC. Methods Ninety-four patients with the diagnosis of PSC were evaluated and followed by the autoimmune liver disease clinic at the University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. Clinical data were recovered from medical charts. Vitamin D status was defined by the serum concentration of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. Patients with levels <50 nmol/L (10 ng/ml) were defined as deficient. Univariate and multivariate analyses were constructed using the Cox proportional hazards regression models. Event-free survival was defined as time from vitamin D assessment to the time of liver transplant or death. Results Mean age at PSC diagnosis was 32±14 years, with 67% of patients being male. The mean vitamin D level was 69±33 nmol/L (range, 4–163 nmol/L) and 26 patients (28%) had vitamin D deficiency (<50 nmol/L). Among 85 patients without cirrhosis at diagnosis, 43 patients (51%) developed cirrhosis. By univariate Cox analysis, serum ALP, albumin, bilirubin and vitamin D deficiency were predictors of cirrhosis development. Vitamin D deficiency was independently associated with higher risk of developing cirrhosis (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.002–4.44, P=0.049) after adjusting for other predictors. Median time to develop cirrhosis was shorter in patients with vitamin D deficiency (6.8 years; 95% CI, 1.7–11.8) compared to those without (10.8 years; 95% CI, 9.2 -12.4; P=0.007). Over a median follow-up period of 5.6 years, adverse outcomes (liver transplant or death) were observed in 34 patients (36%). Serum levels of albumin, ALP, bilirubin, INR, platelet count, ascites, variceal bleeding and vitamin D deficiency were associated with adverse outcomes in univariate analysis. Vitamin D deficiency was independently associated with higher risk of adverse endpoints (HR 2.87, 95% CI, 1.16–7.12, P=0.02) after adjusting for confounding factors. Event-free survival was shorter in the patients with vitamin D deficiency compared to those without deficiency (7.1 years; 95% CI, 2.4–11.9 vs. 11.4 years; 95% CI, 8.9–13.9, P=0.03, Figure 1). Conclusions Vitamin D deficiency was frequent in patients with PSC and was associated with higher risk of progression to cirrhosis, as well as decreased time to death and liver transplantation. The possibility of improving outcomes in PSC by vitamin D supplementation awaits further investigation. Funding Agencies Food and Health Innovation Initiative (Vitamin Fund), University of Alberta

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicLiver Diseases and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207