MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008846810 · doi:10.1080/24740527.2020.1714431

Risk factors for severe opioid-induced respiratory depression in hospitalized adults: A case–control study

2020· article· en· W3008846810 on OpenAlexaff
Mădălina Boitor, Ariane Ballard, Jessica Emed, Sylvie Le May, Céline Gélinas

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Pain · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineJewish General HospitalCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-MontréalUniversité de MontréalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDepression (economics)Odds ratioOpioid(+)-NaloxoneConfidence intervalConcomitantInternal medicineCase-control studyRisk factorMedical recordRetrospective cohort studyRespiratory failureAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

: Some adult hospitalized patients were at higher risk of experiencing severe OIRD, such as those with renal failure, those in their first 24 h of opioid administration, those receiving CNS depressants in addition to opioids, and those with an advanced age. These results will assist with the screening of patients at higher risk for severe OIRD, which is key to implementing appropriate monitoring and enhancing the safety of opioid use in hospital settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PainSame topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleepFrench-language works237,207