MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008888394 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.108

A109 CELIAC DISEASE IS A RARE CAUSE OF BENIGN DUODENAL STRICTURE

2020· article· en· W3008888394 on OpenAlexaff
I Balubaid, Nitin Khanna

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDuodenumEsophagogastroduodenoscopyVomitingNauseaEsophageal stricturePepticRare diseaseSurgeryWeight lossGastroenterologyEndoscopyInternal medicineDiseaseDysphagiaPeptic ulcer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Benign duodenal stricture is an uncommon problem encountered by gastroenterologists. The most common cause is peptic ulcer disease (PUD). With the diagnosis and eradication of H. Pylori, early diagnosis of PUD and the use of PPIs to treat upper gastrointestinal inflammation, the incidence of benign duodenal stricture has dramatically decreased. Patients with duodenal stricture may present with early satiety, nausea, vomiting and weight loss. We present the case of a man with a refractory web-like stricture in the second part of the duodenum (D2) caused by Celiac disease. Aims To describe a rare endoscopic finding in a patient with Celiac disease Methods Case report with literature review Results We present a case of a 64 year old male was referred for consideration of duodenal stenting of a refractory stricture in the second part of the duodenum D2. The patient had a 1 year history of abdominal pain, early satiety and weight loss (10 lbs). He also reported intermittent episodes of diarrhea. Investigations included a CT scan of the abdomen which showed a stricture at the level of proximal D2 described as a “duodenal band”. Previous attempts at balloon dilation had not resulted in prolonged symptomatic or endoscopic improvement. Testing for H. Pylori was negative and he did not use NSAIDs. Upper endoscopy was performed to assess the stricture prior to consideration of stenting. This showed a tight web-like stricture in proximal D2. The stricture was balloon dilated up to 16.5 mm, enabling the endoscope to pass beyond it. The mucosa in D2 was atrophic with flattening of the folds and scalloping. There was no inflammation seen. Biopsies from D2 revealed moderate villous blunting and intraepithelial lymphocytosis. Celiac serology testing was abnormal, with an anti-tTG Ab level of 32 RU/ml which confirmed the diagnosis of Celiac disease. The balloon dilation and gluten-free diet resulted in resolution of his symptoms. Follow up endoscopy revealed normalization of his duodenal folds and biopsies. In addition, anti-tTG Ab level was normalized. Although stricture improved with prolonged patency, he still has mild recurrence of his stricture requiring balloon dilation on an annual basis. Conclusions This case describes a very uncommon complication of Celiac disease. The likely pathophysiology involves inflammation and potentially ulceration from Celiac disease, resulting in a benign stricture. There have been a few case reports describing duodenal strictures as a complication of Celiac disease. Treatment involves a gluten-free diet and endoscopic therapy. More severe cases of obstruction would likely require surgical intervention. In our case, the gluten-free diet and balloon dilation were successful and duodenal stenting was not necessary. Given the possibility of Celiac disease as a cause of duodenal stricture, it would be reasonable to biopsy D2 and check anti-tTG Ab in cases of duodenal stricture. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicGastrointestinal disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207