MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008892941 · doi:10.1002/jso.25877

Contemporary conditional cancer‐specific survival after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with nonmetastatic urothelial carcinoma of upper urinary tract

2020· article· en· W3008892941 on OpenAlexaff
Giuseppe Rosiello, Carlotta Palumbo, Sophie Knipper, Angela Pecoraro, Stefano Luzzago, Marina Deuker, Francesco Alessandro Mistretta, Zhe Tian, Nicola Fossati, Andrea Gallina, Francesco Montorsi, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Fred Saad, Alberto Briganti, Pierre I. Karakiewicz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Surgical Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHazard ratioProportional hazards modelUrologyCancerCohortUpper urinary tractInternal medicineUrothelial carcinomaOncologyGastroenterologyUrinary systemConfidence intervalBladder cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background and Objectives To examine the effect of conditional survival on 5‐year cancer‐specific survival (CSS) probability after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in a contemporary cohort of patients with non‐metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UTUC). Methods Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (2004‐2015), 6826 patients were identified. Conditional 5‐year CSS estimates were assessed after event‐free follow‐up duration. Multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models predicted cancer‐specific mortality (CSM) according to event‐free follow‐up length. Results Overall, 956 (14.0%) were T 1 low grade(LG)N 0 , 1305 (19.1%) T 1 high grade(HG)N 0 , 1215 (17.8%) T 2 N 0 , 2249 (32.9%) T 3 N 0 and 1101 (16.1%) T 4 N 0 /T any N 1‐3 . From baseline, 93.4% to 94.2% in T 1 LGN 0 provided 5‐year CSS and, respectively, 86.2% to 95.3% in T 1 HGN 0 , 77.5% to 87.8% in T 2 N 0 , 63.0% to 91.1% in T 3 N 0 , and 38.8% to 88.2% in T 4 N 0 /T any N 1‐3 . In MCR models, relative to T 1 LGN 0 , T 1 HGN 0 (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.7), T 2 N 0 (HR 3.0), T 3 N 0 (HR: 5.2), and T 4 N 0 /T any N 1‐3 (HR 11.9) were independent predictors of higher CSM. Conditional HRs decreased to levels equivalent to T 1 LGN 0 at 3 years vs 5 years of event‐free survival for T 1 HGN 0 and all other groups, respectively. Conclusions A direct relationship exists between event‐free follow‐up and survival probability after RNU. From a clinical perspective, such survival estimates may have particular importance during preoperative counseling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Surgical OncologySame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207