MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3008959353 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.120

A121 SILENCING ENTERIC SENSORY NEURONS ABOLISHES THE EXCITATORY EFFECT OF SERTRALINE ON VAGAL AFFERENTS

2020· article· en· W3008959353 on OpenAlexaff
Christine West, Andrew M. Stanisz, John Bienenstock, Wolfgang Kunze

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVagus nerveNeuroscienceEnteric nervous systemChemistryAnatomyMedicineBiologyStimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Two thirds of vagal afferents supplying the small intestine terminate on intrinsic primary afferent neurons (IPANs) of the enteric nervous system via intraganglionic laminar endings (IGLEs) rather than the luminal epithelium (FASEB J, 28, 3064–3074, 2014). The IPAN to IGLE connection forms a functional intramural sensory synapse within the myenteric plexus. We have recently shown (Sci Rep, 9, 14290, 2019) that the antidepressant behavioural effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are dependent on the vagus nerve and that intraluminal application of the SSRIs fluoxetine and sertraline increase vagal afferent firing rate in vitro. Aims We hypothesize that the vagal afferent response to intraluminal sertraline is mediated by IPAN to IGLE sensory signaling. Methods Mesenteric nerve recordings were performed using 2–3 cm jejunal segments and attached mesentery from 6–8 weeks old male Balb/c mice. Jejunal tissue was pinned out and dissected in a petri dish of Krebs to remove excess mesentery to isolate the mesenteric nerve bundle. Multi-unit electrical activity was recorded by patch-clamp electrode using an amplifier and signal converter by sucking onto the mesenteric nerve bundle with a glass micropipette. Baseline firing was recorded for 30 mins during luminal Krebs perfusion. The vagal afferent firing response to sertraline (10 µM) was measured in the absence or presence of 5 µM of the intermediate conductance calcium-dependent (IKCa) channel opener 5,6-dichloro-1-ethyl-1,3-dihydro-2H-benzimidazole-2-one (DCEBIO) to the serosa to selectively silence IPANs. Dataview software (J Neuroscience Methods, 185, 151, 2009) was used to isolate single unit firing post-hoc. Vagal fibre action potentials were identified by response to CCK. Results Intraluminal sertraline decreased the mean vagal interspike interval (increased vagal firing frequency) by 29% (p = 0.008) compared to Krebs control (N = 15 fibres). In contrast, addition of luminal sertraline in the presence of DCEBIO increased mean vagal interspike interval by 48% (p = 0.0103) compared to Krebs control (N = 12 fibres). Serosal addition of the N-type Ca2+ channel blocker w-Conotoxin GVIA simultaneously with luminal sertraline increased the mean vagal interspike interval by 12% (p = 0.0282) compared to Krebs control (N = 7 fibres). Conclusions Silencing of myenteric IPANs to vagus neurotransmission blocked excitatory response of vagal afferent fibres to intraluminal sertraline. Blocking myenteric neurotransmission reduced the vagus excitatory response to sertraline by more than 50%. These results suggest that the therapeutically necessary vagus nerve stimulation by sertraline involves activation of the myenteric intramural sensory synapse. Funding Agencies NSERC, OGS

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicGastrointestinal motility and disorders→French-language works237,207→