MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008964358 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.134

A135 HEPATOLITHIASIS AND CHOLANGIOPATHY IN PEDIATRIC CYSTIC FIBROSIS: A CASE REPORT

2020· article· en· W3008964358 on OpenAlexaff
Simone Kortbeek, S Bhandal, Helen M. Machida, Steven R. Martin, Gary Galante

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyHepatolithiasisAbdominal painCommon bile ductStentMagnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographyCholestasisRadiologyGastroenterologyPancreatitisSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Liver disease has emerged as an important cause of cystic fibrosis (CF)-associated morbidity due to recent advancements in management and a resultant increase in life expectancy. Although focal biliary cirrhosis remains the pathognomonic finding in CF, other hepatic manifestations exist but are not as well described, particularly in the pediatric population. Aims Present two rare manifestations of pediatric CF-associated liver disease. Methods In this report, we present a pediatric CF patient with chronic abdominal pain who was found to have hepatolithiasis, cholangitis and secondary sclerosing cholangitis. Results A 12-year-old boy with CF was seen for abdominal pain with functional impairment. He had prior evidence of calculi in the common bile duct (CBD) and right intrahepatic (IH) duct, and had undergone endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) twice with sphincterotomy once. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) at presentation showed dilated CBD and bilateral IH ducts with calculi, evidence of acute cholecystitis and early cholangitis. He subsequently underwent a third ERCP with stone retrieval, stent placement and a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ursodiol dose was optimized and antibiotics were initiated. Follow-up MRCP showed improvement in CBD and IH duct dilation; the stent was removed. One month later, a fifth ERCP was performed for worsening symptoms associated with a distal filling defect in the left IH duct. Sludge was removed from the CBD and another stent was placed. A sixth ERCP with stent removal showed no stones. Interval MRCP showed resolution of IH calculi, a CBD filling defect suggestive of sludge, and thickening and enhancement of IH bile ducts with focal areas of alternating narrowing and dilation. He was maintained on antibiotics, and his symptoms persisted over the following months despite resolution of sludge, peri-portal edema and duct-wall enhancement. There was a background of increased IH ductal dilation with “beaded appearance”. Interval imaging has demonstrated persistence of these findings with recurrence of hepatolithiasis in both IH ducts, despite improved symptoms. Conclusions This case describes two rare manifestations of pediatric CF-associated liver disease: hepatolithiasis and secondary sclerosing cholangitis. While CFTR dysfunction alone predisposes to gallstone formation, the patient’s clinical course supports a theory for the development of hepatolithiasis resembling that of recurrent pyogenic cholangitis, whereby bacteriobilia from chronic or recurrent infection may promote lithogenesis in the presence of inflammatory bile duct damage. In this patient, secondary sclerosing cholangitis may have resulted from cycles of cholangitis and hepatolithiasis; alternatively, it may represent under-recognized cholangiopathy in the pediatric CF population. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0080.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicPediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207