MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009023466 · doi:10.69554/tqvk6767

Using advanced audience tactics in paid media to keep up with the modern consumer

2019· article· en· W3009023466 on OpenAlexaff
Brooke Osmundson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of digital & social media marketing. · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia Studies and Communication
Canadian institutionsNordic Life Science Pipeline (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdvertisingBusinessAestheticsSociologyMultimediaComputer scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper will discuss the changing landscape of paid search and how this affects the setup and structure of paid search campaigns. It describes in depth how the combination of keyword and audience targeting has become essential to search, display and YouTube campaigns. Building on this, the article provides detailed guidance on how to make audience-targeting part of a digital marketing campaign, informed by specific goals and where the consumer is in the purchase/lead funnel. The article also offers words of caution with respect to problems that could derail campaigns. The examples given in this article use anonymised client data and describe how companies are experimenting with newly available advertising features to reach their specific goals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.533
Threshold uncertainty score0.616

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of digital & social media marketing.Same topicMedia Studies and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207