MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009157520 · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2019.10.051

International Severe Asthma Registry

2019· review· en· W3009157520 on OpenAlexaff
Giorgio Walter Canonica, Marianna Alacqua, Alan Altraja, Vibeke Backer, Elisabeth H. Bel, Leif Bjermer, Unnur Steina Björnsdóttir, Arnaud Bourdin, Guy Brusselle, George Christoff, Borja G. Cosío, Richard W. Costello, J. Mark FitzGerald, Peter G. Gibson, Liam G. Heaney, Enrico Heffler, Mark Hew, Takashi Iwanaga, Rupert Jones, Chin Kook Rhee, Sverre Lehmann, Lauri Lehtimäki, Dóra Lúðvíksdóttir, Anke H. Maitland‐van der Zee, Andrew Menzies‐Gow, Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos, Vicente Plaza, Luis Pérez de Llano, Matthew Peters, Celeste Porsbjerg, Mohsen Sadatsafavi, You Sook Cho, Yuji Tohda, Trung N. Tran, Eileen Wang, James Zangrilli, Lakmini Bulathsinhala, Victoria Carter, Isha Chaudhry, Neva Eleangovan, Naeimeh Hosseini, Thao Le, Ruth Murray, Chris Price, David Price

Bibliographic record

VenueCHEST Journal · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
FundersUCB PharmaNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesEfficacy and Mechanism Evaluation ProgrammeSanofi GenzymeGenentechHumanitas UniversityAmsterdam University Medical CentersAstraZenecaAllergy TherapeuticsTartu ÜlikoolAstellas PharmaMylanRegeneron PharmaceuticalsShireRespiratory Effectiveness GroupChiesi FarmaceuticiNovartis Pharmaceuticals UK LimitedAKL Research and DevelopmentCSL BehringDanoneTeijin PharmaDaiichi-SankyoUnited Therapeutics CorporationMedical Research CouncilTeva Pharmaceutical IndustriesHandokSanofiAmgenMeiji Seika PharmaPfizerGlaxoSmithKline
KeywordsAsthmaMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCHEST JournalSame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207