[Rotavirus G9-Ⅵ Re-emerging and Circulating Predominantly in Children with Diarrhea in Beijing].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The first reported group A rotavirus(RVA)G9 strain T203 in mainland China detected from an infant in Beijing in 1994 clustered within VP7 lineage Ⅵ(G9-Ⅵ),whereas the common RVA G9 belong to VP7 lineage Ⅲ(G9-Ⅲ) worldwide. Interestingly, since it was first reported in 1994 there was no G9-Ⅵ circulating in Beijing, until an unexpected G9-Ⅵ strain was identified by sequencing in 2010 RVA surveillance. This present study was to develop a convenient and effective dot-blot hybridization method for differentiating G9-Ⅲ and G9-Ⅵ rotaviruses, to investigate the re-emerging circulating distribution of G9-Ⅵ RVAs in outpatient children with diarrhea from 2011 to 2012in Beijing. By multiple-sequence aligning and analyzing the collected VP7 gene nucleotide sequences of G9 RVAs worldwide from GenBank database using Clustal W software, a region within VP7 gene which is highly divergent between G9-Ⅲ and G9-Ⅵ rotaviruses and conserved within themselves was selected as probe. One pair of common primers at both side of this probe region was designed, and used for synthesizing DIG labeled G9-Ⅲ and G9-Ⅵ probes with PCR, respectively. Subsequently, RVA G and P genotypes were identified as previously described. Then G9-Ⅲ and G9-Ⅵ were further differentiated from G9 RVAs using dot-blot hybridization method established in this study. It was showed that G9 was the most prevalent genotype(43.5%),followed by G3(30.5%)、G1(12.2%)and G2(11.5%),and no G4 genotype was detected.Interestingly,G9-Ⅵ was the most predominant(96.5%) type, while only 3.5% was G9-Ⅲ among these G9 rotaviruses.Phylogenetically,G9-Ⅵ rotaviruses in this study clustered closely with human G9-Ⅵ rotaviruses which were more recently re-emerging in several countries including China around the world as well as porcine G9-Ⅵ rotavirus strain F7P4 in Canada, whereas they clustered distantly to worldwide common G9-Ⅲ strains.G9-Ⅵ rotaviruses were re-emerging in the world, whether it gained stronger spreading ability or virulence than ever common G9-Ⅲ during evolution with porcine G9-Ⅵ rotaviruses need further analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".