Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Disability, Public Space Performance and Spectatorship: Unconscious Performers, Bree Hadley (2014) New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 224 pp., ISBN: 9781137396075 Enacting Nature: Ecocritical Perspectives On Indigenous Performance, Birgit Däwes and Marc Maufort (eds) (2014) Brussels: Peter Lang (2014), 262 pp. ISBN-10: 2875741462; ISBN-13: 978-2875741462 Playing for Time: Making Art as if the World Mattered, Lucy Neal (ed.) (2015) Oberon Books, London, 466 pp., ISBN: 9781783191864, p/bk, 16.99 GBP Performing Indigeneity: Global Histories and Contemporary Experiences, Laura R. Graham and H. Glenn Penny (eds) (2014) Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press, 431 pages ISBN 978-0-8032-5686-6 (paperback), $36 USD Salmon is Everything: Community-based Theatre in the Klamath Watershed, Theresa May, Suzanne Burcell, Kathleen Mccovey and Jean O’Hara (2014) Corvallis: Oregon State University Press, 188 pp., ISBN: 9780870717468, p/bk, $19.95
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.482 | 0.346 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".