Foreseeing Congestion using LSTM on Urban Traffic Flow Clusters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Currently, Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), is revolutionizing the transportation industry. ITS incorporates advanced Internet of Things (IoT) technologies to implement Smart City. These technologies produce tremendous amount of real time data from diverse sources that can be used to solve transportation problems. In this paper, we focus on one such problem, traffic congestion in urban areas. A road segment affected by traffic affects the surrounding road segments. This is obvious. However, over a period of time, other roads not necessarily close in proximity to the congested road segment may also be affected. The congestion is not stationary. It is dynamic and it spreads. We address this issue by first formulating a similarity function using ideas from network theory. Using this similarity function, we then cluster the road points affected by traffic using affinity propagation clustering, a distributed message passing algorithm. Finally, we predict the effect of traffic on this cluster using long-short term memory neural network model. We evaluate and show the feasibility of our proposed clustering and prediction algorithm during peak and non-peak hours on open source traffic data set.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".