MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009345436 · doi:10.24442/boristheses.1644

A Northern City going elsewhere

2019· dissertation· en· W3009345436 on OpenAlex
Anja Thiel

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNoise Effects and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSound (geography)Sound changeHistoryGeographyOceanographyGeologyPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Atlas of North American English (Labov, Ash, & Boberg, 2006) found that dialect diversity in North America was increasing, via the continuing advancement of regional sound changes such as the Northern Cities Shift (NCS). In the decade since the Atlas’s publication, however, indications have emerged that that conclusion was premature, with multiple studies finding retreat from the NCS in communities where it was expected to be stable or advancing (e.g. Wagner, Mason, Nesbitt, Pevan, & Savage, 2016; Driscoll & Lape 2015). This dissertation reports a real-time study demonstrating that the loss of NCS can be rapid indeed. This study examines the loss of the NCS in Ogdensburg, a small city in rural Northern New York, on the Canadian border. On the basis of nine speakers interviewed there in 2008, Dinkin (2009, 2013) described Ogdensburg as the northeasternmost limit of the NCS, with some evidence that the NCS was advancing in apparent time. Furthermore, the data suggested an incipient merger of the low back vowels LOT and THOUGHT in the community, a feature that has been believed to be incompatible with the NCS (Labov et al., 2006). In this study, I compare those nine speakers interviewed in 2008 with a new sample of 39 speakers from the same city that I interviewed in 2016, and supplement speech production data with social perception data. The results suggest that, in the eight years between 2008 and 2016, the NCS apparently disappeared from Ogdensburg, a change that is visible in nearly all phonemes of the NCS. It appears that the community is orienting toward a new system, the Elsewhere Shift, including the merger of LOT and THOUGHT, a development that has been reported in other traditional NCS communities as well (e.g. Wagner et al., 2016). It seems that increasing negative evaluation of at least two NCS features may have been the driving force behind the abandonment of the NCS in Ogdensburg, and the points in apparent-time at which the changes emerge in the data suggest that these evaluations and the consequential restructuring of the community’s vowel system might be a response to a myriad of social changes in the community in the second half of the 20th century (Coupland, e.g. 2009).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score0.876

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it