MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009434275

The Canadian Urban System,1971-2001: Responses to a Changing World

2003· article· en· W3009434275 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. Aaron Simmons, Larry S. Bourne

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrbanization and City Planning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada is now overwhelmingly an urban nation. More than 80% of Canadians now live in urban areas and over 60% in the larger metropolitan regions. As those cities change, so too does the nation. In recent decades, Canadian cities and the entire urban system have .undergone a substantial transformation, not least because the context - national and international - in which Canadian cities have developed has changed. As the factors driving change have evolved, so must our ideas evolve about how the urban system is organized. Drawing on an extensive body of research on urban Canada over the last thirty years, much of it undertaken through the Centre for Urban and Community Studies, this paper provides an overview of change in the Canadian urban system for the period from 1971 to 2001. lt begins with a critical review of the earty ideas that guided that research and offers a revised and more comprehensive conceptual framework. Particular attention is paid to the importance of changes in the national environment- in the economy, the demography, and the public sector- and to shifts in the global environment that have in combination reshaped the urban system. The empirical analysis then demonstrates how that system has responded. Each change in the external environment produces a different pattern of linkages within the urban system and with cities outside the country, and thus a new geography of urban growth and change. The paper concludes with a review of current forecasts of anticipated urban growth to 2026 and speculates on the future evolution of the urban system within a rapidly changing continental and global environment. That system will certainly continue to evolve, but often in unpredictable ways. Growth is likely to become more uneven, with further concentration in a few large metropolitan regions and with much of the rest of the country in relative decline. The direction of evolution of the urban system is likely to become more dependent on forces emanating from outside the country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score0.805

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.014
Science and technology studies0.0310.008
Scholarly communication0.0120.003
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace (University of Toronto)Same topicUrbanization and City PlanningFrench-language works237,207