MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009519938 · doi:10.1016/j.hpcr.2019.200297

Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma of the central nervous system, a masquerader on radiography and clinical presentation: A case report

2020· article· en· W3009519938 on OpenAlexaff
Serge Koujanian, Sarah Al-Rawaf, Euan Zang, John Provias

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Pathology Case Reports · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHamilton General HospitalMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRadiologyBrain biopsyIntravascular large B-cell lymphomaBiopsyStroke (engine)Work-upHemiparesisEmergency departmentAngiography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 72-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with progressive left hemiparesis, confusion, urinary incontinence and frequency. She was hospitalized multiple times during the last 6 months for stroke work-up and seizure management necessitating intubation and ICU admission. An MRI done at that time revealed multiple foci of abnormal diffusion restriction in both cerebral hemispheres. Further vasculitis work-up was positive for ANA and RNP A and the patient was started on high dose prednisone therapy without significant improvement. A CT with contrast done during the latest admission showed a hyper-dense enhancing nodule in the right frontal lobe suggestive of metastasis. She underwent a right-sided frontal image guided needle biopsy. The pathology was consistent with intravascular large B cell lymphoma (IVLBCL). IVLBCL limited to the central nervous system (CNS) is extremely rare [1], with only few cases reported in the literature [2]. It is usually misdiagnosed as cerebral infarction on radiology and clinical presentation. Definite diagnosis necessitates tissue biopsy. Hereby we present the 9th case of biopsy proven IVLBCL limited to the CNS mimicking cerebral infarction and inflammatory conditions on radiography and by clinical presentation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman Pathology Case ReportsSame topicCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207